I've seen funniest a few times in that context, but isn't that a derivation of funny? Is there a superlative of fun or do we really use funniest for the lack of one?
|
closed as general reference by simchona♦, Daniel δ, aedia λ, Hugo, kiamlaluno Oct 15 '11 at 10:16
This question is too basic; it can be definitively and permanently answered by a single link to a standard internet reference source designed specifically to find that type of information. See the FAQ for guidance on how to improve it.
|
A joke that causes the greatest mirth might be the funniest joke. But a party that gives the greatest enjoyment? To be informal, colloquial and non-standard, I offer the funnest party. |
|||||
|
|
Funniest is the superlative of funny (and funnier is the comparative). This is not "for lack of one"; "funniest" is the superlative. Funny forms its superlative and comparative according to the standard rule (as in red, redder, reddest and fast, faster, fastest). Words that do not follow this pattern (such as good, better, best) are termed "irregular". |
|||
|
|
|
I would say funfilled.
|
|||||||
|