English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

If I had a list of awards and wanted to organise that list by the organizations that gave out those awards, what would be a good word to use?

I can only think of by awarder which doesn't sound great.

share|improve this question

The question phrasing ("organizations that gave out those awards") is too muddled for a definitive answer to be given. 'Presenter' is a proper word for the person that hands over the award. 'Sponsor' is a proper word for an organization that funds an award. 'Host' is a possible word for an organization that puts on an awards ceremony.

share|improve this answer

"Organization" works if they're all organizations. "Source" works if you want to be more general, for example if some awards are awarded by people rather than groups.

If the award context is already established (this is a list of awards, with such a heading), then you don't really need an award-specific word like "awarder" (which, as you say, isn't great).

share|improve this answer

It may depend some on the type of award, but sponsor covers a lot of territory:

1. a person who vouches or is responsible for a person or thing.

share|improve this answer

Either conferrer or grantor may work if the context is correct. If this situation applies to organizations that don't actually determine the award recipients, presenter might be better.

share|improve this answer

As ever, it depends on the context. In some situations, donor might be appropriate.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.