English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

According to the Online Etymological Dictionary the origin of the word is:

1580s, originally in slang phrase to make a coax of, from earlier noun coax, cox, cokes "a fool, ninny, simpleton" (1560s); modern spelling is 1706. Origin obscure, perhaps related to cock.

But how did a noun meaning "fool" end up as a verb meaning "to influence?"
Is it just because someone who is influenced easily is a fool?

share|improve this question
I would not say "influence" is a close synonym of "coax". – Colin Fine Oct 10 '11 at 16:51
up vote 3 down vote accepted

One of the early meanings of the verb coax was indeed ‘to make a “cokes” [a fool] of, befool, impose upon, “take in”.’ Another that ran in parallel with it for a while was ‘to make a pet of; to pet, fondle, caress; to treat endearingly or with blandishment’. (Definitions from OED.) It’s not too hard to see how these two uses could lead to the current meaning. (It might perhaps be worth mentioning in passing that the word silly took an opposite path, going from positive to negative. It started life by meaning blessed.)

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.