Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm looking for a word that means "to exist in the same place as something else."

For example: two functions have the same points when plotted on a graph, so they __.
(overlap? coincide? ... ?)

I used Google to translate (my native language is Dutch), and it came up with 'coincide'. But doesn't that mean to happen at the same time as something else?

share|improve this question

10 Answers 10

Coincide works well. It's what I would use:

The graphs of f(x) and g(x) coincide between x=2 and x=6.

Dictionary.com's first definition is:

to occupy the same place in space, the same point or period in time, or the same relative position: The centers of concentric circles coincide. Our vacations coincided this year.

share|improve this answer
1  
Thanks, that answered my question. I'll stick with 'coincide'. –  Wouter Oct 6 '11 at 13:07
4  
For reason, I suspect maths books from years back, I would say "they are coincident" rather than "they coincide". FWIW. –  Wudang Oct 6 '11 at 16:17

Another word that would work well for two functions in a graph that meet would be intersect.

A word that would mean to exist in the same place as something else (geographically), would be colocated.

share|improve this answer
1  
"Intersect" means that they have some point in common. The question implies that he is looking for a word indicating the two occupy the same location at all points. –  Jay Oct 6 '11 at 21:45

In some cases "co-located" is appropriate. Many will recognize this use as applied to web servers and other computer equipment.

share|improve this answer

You might also say there were conterminous - 'coincident in their boundaries; exactly co-extensive' (OED).

share|improve this answer

su·per·im·pose may be another possibility here. This works particularly well for flat objects (images, pieces of glass …) but also quite nicely for graphs of functions.

A Google search turns up many more close hits for this word than for e.g. coincide in connection with graphs, but this may be due to poor inflection (though notice that Google handles inflection well in the first query).

share|improve this answer
    
I like superimpose a lot. I was looking for a word that is technically correct, but that would be understood by anyone. Superimpose fits perfectly, thanks. –  Wouter Oct 6 '11 at 22:23

In the context of graphs, I think "coincide" is the correct word.

In general, I'd use "coexist". "conterminous" is also appropriate but sounds more technical.

If you want to say that two things share just a small percentage of their space, you'd say "intersect". If you want to say a large percentage but not 100%, you could use "overlap".

share|improve this answer

If this is a mathematical context, then

Two functions are equal

if they evaluate to the same values on same input, that is, they overlap everywhere.

share|improve this answer

Colocalization puts more emphasis on the location and may therefore be less ambiguous that coincide:

In fluorescence microscopy, colocalization refers to observation of the spatial overlap between two (or more) different fluorescent labels, each having a separate emission wavelength, to see if the different "targets" are located in the same area of the cell or very near to one another.

share|improve this answer

As mentioned, coincide and intersect both work, as do many common words stapled to the prefixes co- and inter-. For technical work, these terms are absolutely fine.

However, if your goal in the future is to paint a warmer or richer picture, consider using terms such as cohabitate, cosituate, intermingle, interweave, entwine, enmesh, or for added dimensionality and dynamicism, over-, under-, interlap, and superimpose.

Another standard term useful for those familiar with intersection detection in N-space and the theory of collision detection might prove useful: interpenetrate. It might elicit a giggle or two from your audience, but it's in common use for situations where two subspaces share some intersection, just not perfect equivalence.

As an aside, you might consider rephrasing your answer in terms of the equivalence relation between your functions. Literally, these two functions are equivalent for range {a,b}; therefore, their representations are identical.

Just food for thought, for next time and for others interested in this question.

share|improve this answer

Sympatric. Two things are sympatric when they exist in the same geographic area at the same time.

share|improve this answer
    
This is usually used in context of biology and species, not mathematical functions. –  American Luke Nov 6 '13 at 1:43

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.