English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

To keep this PG, I've changed the popular saying we've all heard:

"He has a huge truck to compensate for his small ego"

But I've recently been using a sort of counter to the joke, in one form or another (which will need some translation to be funny, or funnier I guess):

"I have a small truck to compensate for my large ego"

My question is, is this a correct usage of the word compensate? Can you compensate for something large with something smaller?

share|improve this question

closed as general reference by Daniel, simchona, Hugo, MrHen, JSBձոգչ Jan 17 '12 at 16:59

This question is too basic; it can be definitively and permanently answered by a single link to a standard internet reference source designed specifically to find that type of information.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

4  
Did you look it up in a dictionary? – Daniel Oct 5 '11 at 21:40
1  
@drɱ65δ, yes but all the definitions were in some form of "Recompense for loss", not "Recompense for an improper balance" – John Oct 5 '11 at 22:25
up vote 4 down vote accepted

Dictionary.com can answer your question:

2. to counterbalance; offset; be equivalent to: He compensated his homely appearance with great personal charm.

Imagine scales balancing your large ego on the one side with the small truck on the other.

share|improve this answer
    
Woohoo! The joke lives on – John Oct 5 '11 at 22:26

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.