Tell me more ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Is it okay to start a sentence with a variable? Do I need to rewrite a sentence just because the subject is typeset as a Greek letter?

For example:

Φ is treated in a special way.

vs.

The variable Φ is treated in a special way.

share|improve this question
1  
related: english.stackexchange.com/questions/2765/… – 1'' Oct 4 '11 at 18:57
2  
You'll get better answers from a more domain specific SE ssite like tex.SE or mathematics.SE. Short answer: It is considered poor form to start a sentence with anything other than text. So yes, you need to rewrite, but s your example shows, it is often very easy to do. – Mitch Oct 4 '11 at 21:23

1 Answer

up vote 10 down vote accepted

It's grammatical to start a sentence with a variable but the latter variant, "The variable Φ is treated in a special way", is less confusing in the following ways:

  • The latter variant makes it clear that you're talking about the variable Φ and not about anything else, such as the sentence Φ or the function Φ.
  • The latter variant makes it more explicit that it's a new sentence, i.e. a dot, a space and a capital letter is a clearer indication of a new sentence than only a dot and a space (this may be less of a problem with certain typesetting techniques, e.g. if your text is typeset with English spacing since it makes new sentences more explicit by adding more than inter-word spacing after each dot ending a sentence).
  • The meaning of the latter variant is more self-contained and this makes the text easier to understand when only reading excerpts of it, e.g. if quoted.

Also, the latter variant is advised against by http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/CMS_FAQ/Numbers/Numbers26.html.

There is one thing that speaks for the former variant, "Φ is treated in a special way", and that is that it's less redundant given that you've explicitly stated that Φ is a variable so that it's obvious to the reader.

Two suggestion:

  1. If you favor the former variant but want to avoid its deficiencies you might want to consider to incorporate it as a subordinate clause in an appropriate sentence, e.g. the sentence before it.

  2. Think carefully whether or not the latter variant is redundant. If it's clearly redundant you might want to avoid it because being overly explicit can confuse or irritate the reader as much as not being explicit enough.

share|improve this answer
thank you for the answer, regarding your first point, the sentence would directly follow either an equation or a sentence giving context for &Phi – 1'' Oct 4 '11 at 19:19
@David Given context it's of course less confusing. See my edit for another argument for the latter variant, self-containment, and a suggestion of how to handle the first variant. – N.N. Oct 4 '11 at 19:30

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.