Tell me more ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.
up vote 23 down vote favorite
2

I'm looking for an expression that conveys an excessive risk management approach that ends up having a worse effect than what it is trying to protect against.

share|improve this question
1  
possible duplicate of Is there an aphorism for doing a self-defeating act? – aedia λ Sep 28 '11 at 17:06
3  
@aedia: I think this question is a bit different. Having a worse effect than what one is trying to protect against, while possibly self-defeating, is also more extreme. – Callithumpian Sep 28 '11 at 17:17
1  
Does the phrase in the title come from somewhere/some language in particular or is it just something you made up to get at what you want? – Mitch Sep 28 '11 at 17:27
1  
@Callithumpian That's a good point. I agree that this is asking for something with more of a destructive connotation, rather than just self-defeating (not making any progress). – aedia λ Sep 28 '11 at 17:47
7  
One point that is unclear in the question is whether the killing of the sheep is intentional. "Cure worse than disease" and "baby with bathwater" do not suggest this. "Burn the village to save it" certainly does. – horatio Sep 28 '11 at 20:25
show 3 more comments

12 Answers

up vote 1 down vote

"An expensive way to save cash" may get the point across to the management.

"A prodigal safe" would be more brief.

share|improve this answer
up vote 2 down vote

There's the (recent) classic: "We had to destroy the village to save it."

share|improve this answer
+1 Glad somebody cited this classic. – marc cenedella Sep 21 '12 at 3:24
up vote 25 down vote

"Cutting your nose off to spite your face"?

Cutting off the nose to spite the face" is an expression used to describe a needlessly self-destructive over-reaction to a problem.

Sounds like a good fit to me!

share|improve this answer
1  
This doesn't seem to be quite the same IMHO. It infers a sense of spite, which the OP did not request. – Urbycoz Sep 29 '11 at 11:01
up vote 9 down vote

The phrase "don't burn down the barn to kill the rats" was used to criticize McCarthyism.

share|improve this answer
up vote 2 down vote

There is a German word "Verschlimmbesserung" which I've seen used in English literature (without it being translated).

Literally translated this would be "disimprovement", ie. an attempt at improvement which makes the end result worse. I think this might fit what you're trying to say.

share|improve this answer
up vote 3 down vote

Sounds like a case of the fox guarding the henhouse/fence eating the crop. There are bound to be other expressions as well. You could also call it a Pyrrhic Solution.

EDIT: In deference to @Mitch's comment below (and the two flaggers), I've hyperlinked the word Pyrrhic, for the record. Thanks, Mitch.

share|improve this answer
2  
You should make Pyrrhic victory an answer on its own. – Mitch Sep 28 '11 at 17:28
2  
Also slightly related: cutting off your nose to spite your face – jwpat7 Sep 28 '11 at 18:42
@Mitch:- Thanks, was AFK. Didn't link it because I'd typed out Solution in place of Victory. Your link makes it clear. – Autoresponder Sep 28 '11 at 20:36
2  
Not quite there: When the fox guards the henhouse, it's because the farmer didn't realize that he was a fox; the original phrase implies that the farmer knows it's a fox and is accepting a foolish risk. – jprete Sep 28 '11 at 21:17
1  
@Jprete: I take your point, but I still think the phrase is turned eaily - e.g., 'it's like the farmer trusting the fox to guard the chickens' – Autoresponder Sep 28 '11 at 21:27
up vote -2 down vote

Out of the frying pan and into the fire

has the possible application of the results of fixing one problem result in worse problems.

share|improve this answer
I do not think this really answers the question. – Sȱɳɨȼ Ʈħe ǶḝÐɠḝħȱɠ Sep 29 '11 at 6:15
up vote 13 down vote

I'd say you're throwing the baby out with the bathwater, in that you're accomplishing your goal but doing it in such an overly thorough way that you end up with very negative consequences.

share|improve this answer
2  
It does normally get used with the very specific meaning that action taken to get rid of the things you don't want is so extreme/indiscriminate that you also end up throwing away the very thing you do want. That precise implication needn't be present in OP's context. – FumbleFingers Sep 28 '11 at 21:30
Which is why I suggested the same in a comment rather than an answer. :) – onomatomaniak Sep 29 '11 at 9:40
up vote 3 down vote

Militarily speaking, the doctrine of mutually assured destruction (MAD), might fit this bill:

A doctrine of military strategy and national security policy in which a full-scale use of high-yield weapons of mass destruction by two opposing sides would effectively result in the complete, utter and irrevocable annihilation of both the attacker and the defender, becoming thus a war that has no victory nor any armistice but only effective reciprocal destruction.

share|improve this answer
up vote 18 down vote

I agree with @FumbleFingers for the general case; "the cure is worse than the disease" is well-understood. If you're looking for something a little more colorful (akin to your title), "we had to burn the village in order to save it" is a US expression arising from the Vietnam war. (As noted there, this is not the original formulation, but it's a common version.)

share|improve this answer
+1 because that's quite a turn of phrase! – FumbleFingers Sep 28 '11 at 18:51
I could have sworn that was from WWII, but all references seem to mention Ben Tre and Vietnam. – Mitch Sep 29 '11 at 12:34
It is of course possible that it has an earlier usage. I'm not old enough to have direct knowledge of WWII. :-) – Monica Cellio Sep 30 '11 at 0:25
up vote 29 down vote

A common saying that comes to mind is The cure is worse than the disease, which thefreedictionary says first appeared in Philip Massinger's 1624 play The Bondman.

share|improve this answer
Ahh, this is good, captures pretty well what I was trying to convey. – Frank Sep 28 '11 at 18:04
@Frank: Yes, I'm surprised there are a couple of "votes to close" on the grounds that your question is an exact duplicate. The linked question very specifically asked for expressions where the action and the reason for taking it are inherently contradictory. The nuance implied by your ...approach that ends up having a worse effect... makes this a significantly different question, IMHO. For example, 'Chop the branch you're sitting on' was an excellent answer there, but would be a bit out of place here. – FumbleFingers Sep 28 '11 at 18:26
2  
This is pretty spot-on. Throwing the baby out with the bathwater also came to mind, but I think yours is a better fit. – onomatomaniak Sep 28 '11 at 18:39
+1. This is a perfect answer. – jprete Sep 28 '11 at 21:12
1  
related xkcd: xkcd.com/938 – Matt Эллен Sep 29 '11 at 10:03
show 3 more comments

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.