I have noticed a lot of people use of instead of have, for example: "that must of been really annoying". Is this correct?
- Anybody can ask a question
- Anybody can answer
- The best answers are voted up and rise to the top
In speech, this is merely a relaxation of pronunciation - should have becomes should've, must have becomes must've. This relaxed pronunciation is fine.
However, the contracted have (i.e. -ve) should not be written as of. Of sounds similar to -ve, so many people erroneously think should of and must of is how to write should've and must've. Should of and must of are improper.
Use should have and must have when you are writing, unless you are writing dialogue, or writing informally. In those cases you also have the option of using the contractions should've and must've:
Or, in dialogue and informal settings (e.g. chat):
protected by RegDwigнt♦ Dec 23 '12 at 19:39
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?