English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Possible Duplicate:
What do you call words that look like a negation but are not?

I found these poor orphaned words that only exist through the life-giving quality of their affix:

feckless, ruthless, unruly, inept, dishevelled, dismayed, disgruntled

I'm sure there are more. They have the familiar appearance of antonyms... Antonyms to something that doesn't exist. It's as if they've lost their positive attitude.

Do these words have a common name?

How did they get this way? They all have standard english affixes with known meaning, so it seems like they should be able to stand on their own. Were the original words lost?

Is there a list of these recognized words somewhere?

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by simchona, JSBձոգչ, RegDwigнt Sep 22 '11 at 12:40

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

At least some of your example words have been addressed here before--you might want to use the search tool and find some of those questions. – simchona Sep 22 '11 at 3:43
I think you might be quite disturbed by the number of such words starting with dis. To be honest I'm not sure we ever had an English word based on the Latin turba=crowd. But I quite like the question, and OP's own coinage "orphaned". Another might be "degenerate" in that we can't "deconstruct" an original word. Except in the case of gruntled we really have created the word by facetious back-formation. – FumbleFingers Sep 22 '11 at 4:13
I thinks this question is directly related to the one you ask – D Krueger Sep 22 '11 at 5:00
@FumbleFingers: "gruntled" may be a back-formation now, but "disgruntled" is from "disgruntle" which is dis- + gruntle etymonline.com/index.php?term=disgruntle – Mr. Shiny and New 安宇 Sep 22 '11 at 12:50
@Mr. Shiny: You are right, of course. Obviously gruntle had to exist in order to be negated in the first place. Though I'm not so sure about etymonline's mention of grumble. It seems to me the original meaning was more the snuffly grunting of contented pigs. Who would presumably be disgruntled if they had no acorns & truffles to root out. – FumbleFingers Sep 22 '11 at 14:23

These words are called "bound morphemes."
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morpheme:

In linguistics, a morpheme is the smallest conceptual meaningful component of a word, or other linguistic unit, that has semantic meaning... a morpheme may or may not stand alone... A morpheme is free if it can stand alone (ex: "lie", "cake"), or bound if it is used exclusively alongside a free morpheme (ex: "im" in impossible).

share|improve this answer
I think bound morpheme only describe part of the word (im in your example, and some of the words of the OP are created by two bound morphemes). It doesn't seems like it would describe the whole word though. – Eldroß Sep 22 '11 at 7:16
Andrew Vit wrote, "I found these poor orphaned words that only exist through the life-giving quality of their affix." He then lists a number of words and asks if there are more. I believe he actually wants to know if there are more bound morphemes that can only exist as words with affixes, because the words themselves are not orphaned. The uniqueness of the words is the bound morpheme. – Mark Sep 22 '11 at 7:20
That's where our interpretation vary, when he says "I think there are more", first he is talking about the "orphaned words" which affix are a part of them, and second his first question is not to ask if there are more. I may states that he think there are more, but he first ask "Do these words have a common name?" as in the "orphaned word" affix included, and not only the bound morpheme. But I guess the only person who could tell which interpretation is right is @Andrew himself. – Eldroß Sep 22 '11 at 7:26

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.