Is there a semantic difference between engine and motor? In some cases, would the use of one or the other word be technically incorrect?
closed as general reference by Robusto, Daniel δ, simchona♦, kiamlaluno, ShreevatsaR Sep 16 '11 at 17:15
This question is too basic; it can be definitively and permanently answered by a single link to a standard internet reference source designed specifically to find that type of information. See the FAQ for guidance on how to improve it.
|
I like the definitions provided by WordNet and their definition is the way I've understood the difference:
So an engine is a specific type of motor. That's why it's not incorrect to speak of a motorboat, or a motorcar, or a motor speedway, even if the boat or car is clearly powered by combustion. Note that if there's no combustion, there's no engine. Purely electric cars don't have engines. As nouns, motor can also refer to a nonspecific agent that causes motion: "happiness is the aim of all men and the motor of all action", and engine can refer to something used to achieve a purpose: "an engine of change", a railway locomotive, or a machine used in warfare: "medieval engines of war". |
|||||
|
|
In a strictly physics sense an engine converts energy into mechanical work. Sometimes they are used interchangeable eg. rocket engine and rocket motor. Motor is generally used for electrical devices but it's also used as an abbreviation for motorized eg. motorboat or motorcycle. |
|||||||||||||
|
|
I picked the relevant parts from my dictionary and would say that these terms have been (over)used figurative. Googles services are called a search-engine but never would be called a search-motor. In the field of software development we talk about graphic-engines, physical-engines etc. but never about motors.
|
|||
|
|
|
The real difference, is the fact that "motors" run on electricity, while "engines" run on combustion. However, many people interchange the usage of these words:
From a mechanic:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
