Which is the past participle of spit: spat or spit? And how many examples can we come up with where a verb is changed in the simple past but unchanged(spelt like in the present) in the past participle?
|
closed as general reference by KitFox♦, Jasper, aedia λ, Daniel δ, simchona♦ Sep 9 '11 at 18:28
This question is too basic; it can be definitively and permanently answered by a single link to a standard internet reference source designed specifically to find that type of information. See the FAQ for guidance on how to improve it.
|
My dictionary says:
which I take to mean that either is acceptable. However, if I were writing about some spit which had already been spat, I'd use "spat" as the past participle to describe the spit:
Using "spit" as the past participle in this case gives:
which doesn't sound right. |
|||||
|
|
In standard English, you generally have:
Depending on your dialect, you could have variations on this, e.g.:
|
||||
|
|
|
There is:
It seems to work only for the two verbs "come" and "run", and their subsequent compound verbs. Perhaps someone else could come up with a unique example. |
||||
|
|