English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Upon answering the telephone, the person calling asks if Joan is available. If Joan is the person who answered the phone, should she say "This is her" or "This is she"?

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by curiousdannii, Dan Bron, ab2, jimm101, Rathony Mar 2 at 4:24

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

Be a literalist and answer "Yes"... then enjoy the delicious awkward silence. – Chris Dwyer Oct 14 '10 at 17:43
Joan would say "Yes, speaking." – ShreevatsaR Oct 15 '10 at 9:26
How about "It is I"? :) – Benjol Oct 15 '10 at 11:18
"This is [name]" is my response. Either way you say this is she or this is her sounds off/odd to me so i don't even bother. – Tim Oct 17 '10 at 0:59
I strongly disagree with the reason for putting this question on "hold". This question was asked nearly six years ago before "include the research" was a requirement. The OP has no chance of saving his question unless someone intervenes. I've seen worse questions than this one left untouched, questions where checking a dictionary entry would have sufficed. How would you search the answer to this question, if you didn't already know the answer!? – Mari-Lou A Mar 3 at 9:09
up vote 21 down vote accepted

Traditional grammarians prefer the nominative ("she") for the complement of the verb "to be". Most usage in my experience prefers the accusative ("her") and regards the verb as having a direct object rather than a complement.

I suspect the traditional grammarians, as they often did, have misapplied a rule of Latin grammar. In Latin, "esse" takes a complement in the nominative case, but Latin declines the verb strongly enough that it doesn't bother with a pronoun as the subject of a verb unless needed for emphasis. "It is she" in Latin would be "illa id est", which looks far more natural than the English.

Note that it's "c'est lui" in French, so there isn't a general rule for a complement of "to be" being in the nominative.


A normal (transitive) verb, like say "have" has a direct object, which is in the accusative case. So, for example, "I have her" uses "her" as a direct object, and "her" is in the accusative case, where "she" is in the nominative case.

In Latin, the verb "esse" ("to be") is special; it doesn't have a direct object in the accusative case, it has a complement in the nominative case. English grammarians in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries adopted a number of rules of Latin grammar into English; this was one of them. In Latin, "it is she" and "she is it" are both the same thing "id illa est" or "illa id est" can both be translated either way - the point being that the "is" ("est") just equates to things to each other - it's like in maths you can have x=y or y=x and they both mean the same thing.

English, though, takes word-order very seriously, and a pronoun after a verb is very strongly marked as being in the objective case and you don't get the benefit that you get in Latin from the exception - there's still one before the verb and one after; you don't get to make clear that it's commutative. So you have a special-case for a verb, which you get no useful benefit from. It's hardly surprising that most English speakers have reverted to "it is her" rather than "it is she".

A note on cases: Latin is conventionally described as having seven cases (though only five are actually different for most nouns and pronouns). It has two cases, accusative and dative for the objects of verbs. English's residual case system only has the one case for both, which merge into the objective case (in fact, a third Latin case, ablative, merges in too). That's why the two paragraphs above appear to use two different words for the same case.

share|improve this answer
I think "it is her" is probably better English; there's a whole set of prescriptive grammar that comes from misapplied analogies from Latin, and this is definitely one of them. – Richard Gadsden Oct 16 '10 at 19:38
For "it is she" pleads that this is probably closer to historical usage, when the ancestor of modern English still had cases, which were most probably applied as in "it is she". // Note that "illa id est" is probably not the way Romans would write it; they'd rather write simply "illa est". This "filler-it" is not used in Latin the same way as in English. – Cerberus Jan 6 '11 at 5:00
..you can have x=y or y=x and they both mean the same thing.. As a student of Mathematics, I would like clarify on that. They are not the same thing but they do imply an equality between x and y. The fact that they are not the same is even more pronounced in computer science where even the equality is not observed, "x = y" would mean that you're assigning the value of y to x. After assignment, the variables become independent of each other. – Nick Dec 27 '13 at 10:13
But you say "it's me", right? How does it fit with this explanation? – Federico Poloni Jan 17 '15 at 8:16
@MichaelScheper the Count in Sesame Street speaks a bit like Dracula, who, of course, originated in a C19 novel, so it makes sense that he uses slightly-archaic Victorian-era English. – Richard Gadsden Feb 29 at 17:31

"This is she" is short for "This is she who is speaking", and so I believe it is more formal.

"This is her" probably isn't technically correct, but it is used enough to be fine.

share|improve this answer
Or simply "Speaking", which is also short for "This is she/he who is speaking" – b.roth Oct 14 '10 at 15:37
@Bruno Good point. I've always found that response somewhat brusque... like I'm a bother to the person or something. – Chris Dwyer Oct 14 '10 at 15:40
Actually, adding the relative clause ("who is speaking") tells you nothing about the case of its antecedent ("her/she"), because that is not in the clause and so is not governed by it. The question is solely about whether you accept "this is me/him/her" or insist on "this is I/he/she". I find the latter to be stilted in most circumstances, but I know a number of Americans use it when answering the phone. (Neither "this is he" nor "this is him" is common in that context in the UK, though "that's me" is not uncommon). – Colin Fine Oct 14 '10 at 16:57
I usually go with "I certainly am" or some such. – Jon Purdy Oct 14 '10 at 17:28
I thought the hidden relative clause to this response would be "whom you are asking for", rather than "who is speaking"... Just as a point of interest. Discuss. – Karl May 15 '11 at 1:40

It's correct either way. English has lost its case system almost completely. This makes it hard even for native speakers to decide between subject case (nominative) and object case (formerly accusative/dative).

A long time ago -- far too long ago to be directly relevant today --, English still had a 'proper' type system and the copula be was followed by subject case. This is normal for Indoeuropean languages. Therefore, originally it would have been (something translating to modern) "It is she".

However, just like French but under the radar, English developed emphatic forms of its pronouns. When an adult asks a bunch of children "Qui veut de la glace ?" / "Who wants some icecream?", the children's natural response is "Moi ! Moi ! Moi !" / "Me! Me! Me!", not "Je ! Je ! Je !" / "I! I! I!" This doesn't mean that the response is in dative / object case but that the response is emphatic. The same emphatic form of the personal pronoun is also used in connection with the copula être / be: "C'est moi." / "This is me."

The French third person feminine pronoun happens to have only one form (elle) for all cases, emphatic or otherwise. In English, the non-emphatic subject case is she, and all other forms (object case and emphatic form) are her. Therefore, in natural English the correct answer is "This is her." This is how non-native speakers learn to say the sentence.

For some reason, there is a tradition in English grammar (as taught to native speakers) to completely ignore the issue of emphatic pronouns and to assume that English has to work like German, which does not have them, or like Latin, where only emphatic pronouns exist and these carry the case distinctions. A non-native speaker who missed the drills for the emphatic pronouns but who, coming from another Indoeuropean language, knows about subject case after be, will quite logically say "This is she." English prescriptivism, in its trademark cluelessness (often pointed out by proper linguists), stepped into the same trap. English has a tradition of rules being made up by ignorant prescriptivists and then taught to generations of students and used as shibboleths that serve to distinguish those who received a 'proper' education from those who just use the language naturally and correctly (such as the working class and of course the likes of Charles Dickens and Jane Austen). As a result, "This is she" became a correct alternative again, long after it had fallen out of use.

(Note on case terminology: English still has subject case and object case, though it only marks them on pronouns. It also has genitive pronouns, but since the former genitive suffix 's is now a possession-marking clitic, the status of genitive as a case in English is even less clear. English subject case is exactly the same thing that is called nominative in German, Latin etc. English object case is the result of a merger of accusative and dative, also known as accudative. This merger has long been completed in English, has almost completed in Dutch and many German dialects, but is still in progress in standard German.)

share|improve this answer
This is a wonderful answer that deserves far more upvotes. – Richard Gadsden Feb 29 at 17:32

Either the subjective (she) or objective (her) would be ok, I think. Personally I'm inclined to answer "This is he".

share|improve this answer

protected by RegDwigнt Jun 21 '12 at 21:02

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.