Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I know that there are two ways to form the past tense of to light (i.e. lit/lighted). Which one is appropriate for the sentence below?

His thoughts lighted our way.

or

His thoughts lit our way.

share|improve this question
1  
For reference: englishrules.com/writing/2006/lit-and-lighted –  simchona Aug 25 '11 at 9:41
1  
This question is easily answered by a dictionary: verb (past lit /lɪt/; past participle lit or lighted). If the question was "why are there two different past participles for some verbs?", we are happy to answer that (we have already). –  z7sg Ѫ Aug 25 '11 at 9:54
    
Here is the thing that I suspect you are missing. english is not my native tongue. I speak and write pretty well though. But sometimes I may miss the nuances of the language. When I googled for lit-lighted I could not find an answer that satisfied me. The worry I had was if these two used for different contexts. For example maybe lit was used for actualy putting something on fire and lighted in a more allegorical way. That is why I gave the example His thoughts lit/lighted our way instead of I lit/lighted a candle. –  yalimgerger Aug 25 '11 at 9:55
3  
    
We understand that many users here are not native speakers. However, asking for the past participle of a verb is fairly general reference. It adds a lot of research to a question if you say "I found that these are both past participles. Are they correct in different situations?" –  simchona Aug 25 '11 at 10:00

3 Answers 3

up vote 2 down vote accepted

I have a feeling that the best word for here is "lighted". "Lighted" is used more when referring to something illuminating another.

When generally referring to a source of light that brightens up the room, "lighted" is preferred:

The lantern lighted the whole room.

"Lit" is generally more used for "setting on fire" :

He lit the paper and threw it in the bin.
The little spark lit the straw, and the whole barn burned down.

Also,"lit" has an alternative meaning:

Slang . under the influence of liquor or narcotics; intoxicated (usually followed by up ).

Thus, I feel that "lighted" would be best here.

His thoughts lighted our way.


"Light" has two meanings, one meaning "to cause to take fire", and the other "to illuminate". When referring to "light" in the first sense, the past would be "lit":

He tried to light his cigar/ He lit his cigar

When referring to "light" in the second sense, "lighted"(often along with "up" is used:

His words were a light to my future/His words lighted up my future.

share|improve this answer
    
Just for everyone's notice, the OP has changed the question, and it is now a valid question. I am reopening the question. –  Thursagen Aug 25 '11 at 10:22
    
Agreed. I had a discussion with the OP, and this seems like a very valid question now. –  simchona Aug 25 '11 at 10:38

This is easy. Lighted and lit are synonymous and can be used in place of each other. There is no rule to use one or the other. Pick either.

share|improve this answer
    
Not yet so, although they're moving towards collapsing into each other. –  StoneyB Dec 5 '12 at 14:18

Lit is British English and lighted is American English, the same thing with dreamt and dreamed respectively.

share|improve this answer
    
Without some authoritative support, this answer is likely to be closed. –  bib Jan 12 at 22:10
2  
Not only do you have no evidence for this, but it seems unlikely in light of this Google Ngram –  Peter Shor Jan 12 at 22:51

protected by RegDwigнt Jun 8 at 18:42

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality answers, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site.

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.