Taken from Wikipedia on Windows and Linux
However such an approach has indeed produced several vulnerabilities, although this is a rare case
Is that statement logically correct because it seems to contradict itself or am I just reading it wrong.
|
Taken from Wikipedia on Windows and Linux
Is that statement logically correct because it seems to contradict itself or am I just reading it wrong. |
||||
|
|
|
Indeed, considering the context:
It could have been misunderstood to mean that "allowing anyone with programming experience to fix bugs" as a rare case, whereas in actuality, the sentence means "the vulnerabilities are rare cases, they do not happen often." Yes, this sentence is ambiguous. |
||||
|
|
|
You're absolutely correct that the sentence could be better written, and other answers have given good suggestions. If you're looking for a logical contradiction between several and rare, though, there is none. Several refers to the number of things (more than a few) whereas rare refers to a proportion of some population. If the population is large enough, than you can have rare things of which there are several: for example, several NBA players have been under six feet, but they are rare. In a very large population, rare cases can have even many instances: many people have eyes of different colours, but they are rare too! |
|||
|
|
|
I think that sentence sounds confusing because it shifts from plural (several vulnerabilities) to singular (case). A better way to phrase it would be |
|||
|
|
|
Agreed, it makes no sense as written. Better expressed:
|
|||
|
|