Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Would an average reader know what "pusillanimous" means? That would be the kind of word I'm looking for if anyone would - it sounds more distant than "cowardly". "Cowardly" sounds like you have a personal vendetta against the person/deed you're referring to. I'm trying to avoid that.

The situation is this: someone is anonymously attacking someone I know, and will not reveal him/herself or back down from attacking, and I want to find a good way to describe such activity, without sounding personally irritated. Not necessarily professional or dignified, but something similar.

share|improve this question
add comment

7 Answers

up vote 5 down vote accepted

Sounds like a case for understatement for ironic effect, such as "less than forthright"

share|improve this answer
1  
+1 That's what Winston Churchill would have done - he once described a lie as a 'terminological inexactitude' to avoid censure in the House of Commons. –  James Taylor Sep 11 '13 at 15:23
add comment

I don't think using pusillanimous would be understood by most readers, and using the word can make you seem pretentious (which may or may not be your intention).

To describe the actions taken by this other person, you might say that they are hiding behind anonymity in order to make these attacks. It is not a single word, but it tends not to be completely accusatory while still describing their actions.

share|improve this answer
    
More than one word is fine. This seems to be a good suggestion. –  Myself Aug 24 '11 at 23:41
    
What? The intension of pretension? –  GEdgar Aug 25 '11 at 12:27
    
Those who have seen the movie Wizard of Oz may know the meaning of pusillanimous! –  GEdgar Nov 25 '11 at 2:04
add comment

A number of alternatives are suggested here, including faint-hearted, scared, spineless, base, weak, shrinking, fearful, craven, dastardly, timorous and pusillanimous (as already suggested).

It can't really be said that any of these avoids a hint of name-calling, and, depending on the nature of the attack, perhaps shrinking, weak, scared, and timorous could be ruled out. I personally would be inclined to go with craven, although that might sound a little archaic.

share|improve this answer
add comment

The Economist has used the word pusillanimous at least twice in the last year or so, if this is a guide to its use in english writing.

I noticed because I had to look it up the first time.

share|improve this answer
add comment

How about 'parapet-hugging'? As in 'he won't put his head above the parapet'.

share|improve this answer
add comment

In Lois McMaster Bujold's sci-fi Vorkosigan series, the culture of the planet Barrayar features a warrior class whose members might challenge someone to a duel upon an insult having to do with cowardice. In this vein, she wrote one character as accusing another of "excessive caution".

It had a nice Churchillian ring to it.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Good heavens -- if this isn't the right occasion for a good old no-holds-barred, fist-swinging, jaw-smacking ad hominem tirade of invective, I don't know what would be.

Your friend's antagonist is clearly not just a deplorably cringing poltroon: he is also a shifty, craven, gutless, yellow-bellied, chicken-livered, nutsack-lacking, slimy specimen of feeble-hearted sissydom and boot-quaking milksop vacillation. I piss on his grovelling, degenerate, turd-licking, namby-pamby, niminy-piminy, twig-quiveringly spiritless soul!

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.