English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

What, if any, is the right way to use "and lo" in a sentence?

My basic structure is "[discussion about thing], and lo, [example of thing]", kind of like: There's a cliche about circus clowns being creepy and dangerous, and lo, last night I saw a clown violating a teddy bear.

Is this proper? Should there be a colon or semicolon after "lo"?

share|improve this question
It should be noted that "and lo" is fairly archaic - the sort of phrasing you expect in traditional fairy tales, not in modern spoken English. – Karl Knechtel Aug 21 '11 at 20:26
up vote 5 down vote accepted

The words 'and lo' are usually followed by an exclamation mark (And lo! the majestic Himalayas, lay untrammeled before their very eyes!) , to emphasize the dramatic nature of the event that has come to pass. 'Lo and behold' is a related variant, also usually followed by an exclamation mark.

share|improve this answer

Lo means look or behold [here/there]. It's not ordinarily used the way OP's example has it, where the amazing sight being referenced isn't actually present at the time of speaking.

In grammatical terms it's an interjection, so any alternative would also need to function in that way. For OP's example, I'd suggest And would you believe it! (an interjection, not a question).

Per @Karl's comment to the question, whilst not exactly "obsolete", it's at the very least least a "dated" usage in most conversational contexts today.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.