English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

"It's precisely in contrast to the ordinary that the resurrection stands out."

Could someone explain what the author meant by "in contrast to the ordinary"? Could I replace "in contrast" in this case with "opposite"?

share|improve this question
up vote 3 down vote accepted

"In contrast to" is used when you are comparing unlike things. So, "the resurrection" stands out from "the ordinary" because it contrasts with it, that is, it differs from it.

share|improve this answer

What the author meant by "in contrast to the ordinary" is that the "resurrection" (which is the thing being referred to) was so unusual, because it was so different from "ordinary". "In contrast to" is used to compare two things, and to list their differences.

You could replace "in contrast" in this case with "opposite" in this case, but there are cases when the two things being compared are not opposites, just slightly different, so "opposite" couldn't replace "in contrast to" in those cases. In this case however, it's fine to replace with "opposite".

An example where "in contrast to" cannot be replaced with "opposite" would be:

The egg of a Dorgen is completely round, in contrast to that of a normal egg, which is slightly oval.

"Opposite" can't be used here, because the "opposite" of round is square, but a normal egg isn't square, but oval. It's only slightly different from round.

share|improve this answer
Could you give me an example when it would be not appropriate to replace "in contrast" with "opposite"? – Jon Aug 20 '11 at 4:49
You generally can't replace "in contrast" with "opposite", really, because "in contrast to X" is written in cases where X does not have a clear opposite. (I would object to the assertion that "the 'opposite' of round is square", for example.) – Karl Knechtel Aug 21 '11 at 1:07

protected by Community Aug 8 '14 at 19:01

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.