English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Judging by the derivative chain lecture appears to be the root itself (comp. lecture, lectur-er, lecture-ship, un-lectur-ed etc.). But I'm not sure if it can be divided by analogy with failure (to fail), creature (to create), departure (to depart) etc. The question is whether "lecture" functions as a monomorphemic or bimorphemic word in Modern English.

share|improve this question
up vote 2 down vote accepted

I think one can safely deem "lecture" as monomorphemic, as its etymology, by Etymonline.com, shows:

late 14c., "action of reading, that which is read," from M.L. lectura "a reading, lecture,"

As you can see, it comes from the Latin word lectura, which means that "lecture" is itself the root word, as its Latin root isn't something like lec or tur. This can be compared to other monomorphemic words, such as "wait" as well as "man"

share|improve this answer
Of course in Latin it is not monomorphemic, but that is irrelevant. – Colin Fine Aug 19 '11 at 14:23
Thanks, everyone! – subic Aug 19 '11 at 14:46

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.