Why is walri not the correct pluralization of walrus?
- Anybody can ask a question
- Anybody can answer
- The best answers are voted up and rise to the top
closed as off-topic by Mari-Lou A, FumbleFingers, Drew, Chenmunka, tchrist Feb 27 '15 at 23:17
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
Only some words of Latin extraction ending in -us, which were second declension nouns in Latin, take -i as plural.
Walrus comes from Dutch, and is akin to Danish and Norwegian hvalros. It is not a Latin second declension noun, so there is no reason it would be pluralized with -i.
The plural of walrus is walruses.
Edit: I just want add an additional note to clarify that even in cases where an English word does come from a Latin second declension noun, its plural might not necessarily end in -i. For example, the plural of campus is campuses not campi, and the plural of bonus is bonuses not boni.
protected by tchrist Feb 26 '15 at 6:16
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?