Why is walri not the correct pluralization of walrus?
- Anybody can ask a question
- Anybody can answer
- The best answers are voted up and rise to the top
closed as off-topic by Mari-Lou A, FumbleFingers, Drew, Chenmunka, tchrist Feb 27 '15 at 23:17
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
Only some words of Latin extraction ending in -us, which were second declension nouns in Latin, take -i as plural.
Walrus comes from Dutch, and is akin to Danish and Norwegian hvalros. It is not a Latin second declension noun, so there is no reason it would be pluralized with -i.
The plural of walrus is walruses.
Edit: I just want add an additional note to clarify that even in cases where an English word does come from a Latin second declension noun, its plural might not necessarily end in -i. For example, the plural of campus is campuses not campi, and the plural of bonus is bonuses not boni.
protected by tchrist Feb 26 '15 at 6:16
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site.
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?