English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

When studying and reading course material in "softer" sciences that are descriptive the word "subsequently" appears in a way like "and subsequently" ...what does it mean, disctinct from "consequently" ?

Is the difference that "subsequently" doesn't imply a causality and the word "consequently" does? For instance A ⇒ B should read "A and consequently B" and in that case using the word "subsequently" is not false but it's not right since the word subsequently doesn't imply a causality which A ⇒ B does, so when talking about causality the we should use is "consequently"?

share|improve this question
subsequence is to consequence as correlation is to causation – Zach Apr 8 at 16:39
up vote 12 down vote accepted

You're correct: subsequently doesn't imply causation.

subsequent: Following in order or succession; coming or placed after, esp. immediately after.

consequent: Following as an effect or result; resulting.

(Both definitions are from the Oxford English Dictionary.)

You might use subsequently to avoid the post hoc, ergo propter hoc fallacy.

share|improve this answer
Thank you Nicholas. I'd like to use the word "ergo" and consquently I should use the word consequently since otherwise would be cheating. Subsequently just could mean ergo but not necessarily. – Dac Saunders Aug 14 '11 at 10:12

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.