Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I recently said the following in chat:

Do you mean 90 cents, or 9 cents?
90 cents.
Okay, you left out the zero so I wasn't sure.

Afterwards it occurred to me I could have replaced the comma with a semi-colon. This led to a discussion with @ArdaXi over what the correct punctuation mark to use in this situation is: a comma, semi-colon, or period. The uncertainty arises from the fact that okay is a pro-sentence.

What is the proper punctuation to use when joining a pro-sentence with an independent clause?

share|improve this question
1  
What do you mean by "pro-sentence"? This isn't an English grammatical term that I'm familiar with. –  JSBձոգչ Aug 11 '11 at 12:05
    
Why do I always seem to stir up questions on this site? –  Arda Xi Aug 11 '11 at 12:07
    
@JSBᾶngs en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pro-sentence –  Wipqozn Aug 11 '11 at 12:11
    
I've added more context to my question –  Wipqozn Aug 11 '11 at 12:52
    
I think that Wikipedia page is a bit of a waste of space. I also think that "okay" could have been a sentence in OP's example, had it been followed by a full-stop. Since it wasn't, it's not. Finally, I think it should have been written as a sentence in its own right, since it's effectively shorthand for "I understand". –  FumbleFingers Aug 11 '11 at 17:21

3 Answers 3

up vote 4 down vote accepted

The punctuation after okay is correct. Sentence-initial particles such as okay, well, so, etc. are written with a following comma.

Well, we decided to move.

So, it seems like John has to get a new care.

In your case, I'd say that you're missing a comma after zero and an additional pronoun:

Okay, you left out the zero , so I wasn't sure.

share|improve this answer
    
The I was a mistake on my part. I edited it into my original sentence. –  Wipqozn Aug 11 '11 at 12:10
    
I suppose it's a moot point what if anything "Okay" means in OP's example. I read it as "I understand.", but I guess you're reading it as "Well yes, but..." –  FumbleFingers Aug 11 '11 at 17:26

What is the proper punction to use when joining a pro-sentence with an independent clause?

It depends on the relevance of the first and second sentence. If the first and second sentence are very closely related, then a comma is used. If the first and second sentences are not that closely related, but still related, a semicolon is used, to show that they are not very closely related, but not separate enough to be entire new sentences.

Examples:

John took an apple, and as a result, all the apples fell from the cart.
John took an apple; Katie took an apple too.

However, in your sentence, okay is not a previous sentence, or an independent clause. It's more of a discourse particle.. In this case, a comma would be used.

share|improve this answer
2  
Hm, according to wikipedia, discourse particle has no direct semantic meaning in the context (examples: well, y'know, like). I agree that 'okay' can be a discourse particle, but it can also semantically stand for 'yes I agree' or 'I understand' in which case it can not be a discourse particle (I believe this is the case here - he agrees with what was previously said and explains why he objected or questioned). –  Unreason Aug 11 '11 at 12:31
    
Yes, but that doesn't make Okay an independent clause –  Thursagen Aug 11 '11 at 12:36
    
How not? If we take it to mean 'yes I agree with what you said', then for sure - it can stand independently. He could have said only 'Okay.' Also, wikipedia lists it as an example of pro-sentence (along with yes, no and amen) - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pro-sentence –  Unreason Aug 11 '11 at 12:46

Depending on the context, if 'okay' is indeed a pro-sentence in your example (if the previous sentence was something like "The number should be one thousand, not one hundred."), then I would say you are missing a semicolon. If the 'okay' in your example is not anaphorically linked to previous information then it would qualify as a discourse particle and should be used with a comma like any other.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.