Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

A few examples of this "future in the past" phenomenon:

If there is no such word or phrase, how can this be described?

share|improve this question
add comment

6 Answers

up vote 5 down vote accepted

"Way ahead of its time" - a phrase which I was surprised to learn goes back at least as far as 1943. (in "The Conquest of Bacteria (From Salvarsan To Sulphapyridine); American Journal of the Medical Sciences; March 1943; Volume 205, Issue 3)

share|improve this answer
add comment

What about pseudo-contemporary?

Although theoretically it could refer to things yet to come, pragmatically in context of real world things it would refer to something that seems contemporary, but is not.

This word does not describe the aspect of being very advanced for its own age.

Another word that is related is futuristic; however this attribute was applicable in the past, not necessarily today. I don't know the word that would be used for ”once futuristic”, but the phrase should work:

All of your examples were once very futuristic.

EDIT: Synonyms of futuristic also work:

Main Entry: futuristic
Part of Speech: adjective
Definition: ahead of one's time
Synonyms: advanced, cutting edge, innovative, modern, pioneering, revolutionary, visionary

I especially like visionary (except for the example of the time traveler photo), which might work in a phrase such as

Douglas C. Engelbart's "Mother of All Demos" was proved visionary.

share|improve this answer
add comment

All your examples are instances of ideas that were prescient.

share|improve this answer
add comment

This is a very specific idea. The phrase I would go with is deceptively old.

share|improve this answer
add comment

A phrase could be "nothing new" :

This is nothing new. It was invented 650 yrs.ago, not in recent times as it seems.

share|improve this answer
    
But without ”as it seems” you are describing any old thing (that someone took for a new thing). Logically it is related, but it is downplaying the most important characteristic of the requested - “surprisingly” –  Unreason Aug 9 '11 at 14:08
add comment

While anachronism often is thought of in the sense "A chronological mistake; the erroneous dating of an event, circumstance, or object", it also has a sense "A person or thing which seems to belong to a different time or period of time". The items listed in your "future in the past" examples are anachronisms in the latter sense.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.