English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I've heard on some American TV shows "I'm starving" instead of "I'm starved".

What is the correct usage of both sentences?.

share|improve this question
up vote 6 down vote accepted

They are both exaggerations of the same thing, namely "I'm very hungry". It seems to make little difference whether the present ongoing tense is used or whether a past tense is used; both are equally valid, and convey the same meaning.

share|improve this answer

My personal opinion is that "I'm starving" implies that the state is ongoing, whereas "I'm starved" implies that some kind of limit has been reached.

share|improve this answer
The difference is very slight. In interpretation of actual usage, I wouldn't presume too much on that distinction. – Daniel Aug 2 '11 at 18:34

I'm starving. - it means, the action in happening. You can feel it now. I'm starved. - it's like, you are officially craving for food! You want to eat now!

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.