English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I can't understand this. In symphony you hear the word "movement" to refer to independent sections. But it seems that it's not really that relevant. Movement almost everywhere has something to do with motion. Is this nomenclature a kind of metaphor for something in music, like moving from one section to another?

share|improve this question
up vote 8 down vote accepted

The earliest meaning of movement in music was how it moved: it's tempo or relative speed (probably referring to the natural movement associated with the beat of the tempo). For instance, the OED quotes an entry from Baily's 1721 dictionary:

Allegro: A Term in Musick when the Movement is quick.

Similarly, Henry Purcell's Sonnatas of III Parts (1683) in its preface speaks of "Allegro, and vivace, a very brisk, swift, or fast movement."

As musical forms with multiple sections, such as symphonies, evolved, each of the sections generally had a different tempo, or movement (which was a main reason for having distinct sections). One would refer to a section of a work by its tempo, e.g. the allegro movement or the largo movement. A natural evolution was then to speak of the several movements of the work, that is, the several sections of different tempos.

The usage of movement in reference to tempo per se has largely died out, but the reference to movements as sections of different tempo has continued. We still often find a tempo term (e.g. vivace) as the title or part of the title for a movement.

share|improve this answer

By definition movement indicates the transfer of an object from one place to another. In music that object could be considered an emotional or conscious state of being, therefore the music may move you.

The musician(s) go through the act of moving physically through the music, making the music the vehicle to that change.

Of course, that is all very esoteric. The fact is, "movement" is just what it's called. "A movement is a self-contained part of a musical composition or musical form." (Wikipedia)

A Sonata, which itself may make up a single movement within a greater composition, it is itself made up of 3 main sections (Development, Exposition, Recapitulation) which can be considered movements themselves within the Sonata form.

Wikipedia is a pretty good start if you want to learn more.

share|improve this answer

From a performance point of view, movement or motion concerns a temporal pattern whcih connects consecutive notes together. If there are several such patterns, developing through a melody, a listener has a sense of being pushed along. It can be a large scale rhythmic pattern, or a gradual crescendo or decrescendo.

I'm just learning to play the flute, and I've noticed that vibrato contributes to forward movement, when I can avoid starting a new vibratory pattern with each note or phrase. Then it's the continuity of pitch variation that connects notes and short phrases together.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.