Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

A lot of people say this when they are challenging someone else:

I'll verse you.

I thought this sentence was grammatically correct. However one day my computer teacher got into an argument with us about it. He whipped out a dictionary and began searching the word "verse" and told us the definition and said that saying "verse" as in challenging is wrong. It should be used as in Home verses Guest. Is that right? If it is, why does the majority say it this way?

share|improve this question

migrated from meta.english.stackexchange.com Jul 22 '11 at 2:18

This question came from our discussion, support, and feature requests site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts.

    
If I may, may I ask why was my question downvoted? I don't understand. –  Phonics The Hedgehog Jul 22 '11 at 21:29
    
I think it is because your question was originally asked on the meta site, which was not the right forum. It has since been migrated here, but I guess the old downvotes remain. –  nohat Jul 22 '11 at 23:21

2 Answers 2

up vote 6 down vote accepted

Your teacher is correct.

I believe that you're mixing up verses vs. versus. Versus should be used in the sense of challenging or opposing someone or something.

share|improve this answer
    
You are correct about the word that it's versus that the attempted verb verse seems to come from. However, versus does not have a standard form that can be used as a verb in the sense of challenging someone. I think your answer may lead the OP to an incorrect conclusion. –  sarah Nov 17 '13 at 3:09

There is no such verb as verse (with third-person singular present tense form verses). The word is versus, it comes from Latin, and it is a preposition that means, basically, against.

share|improve this answer
2  
If it is true that "A lot of people are saying 'I'll verse you'", then plainly there is such a verb, even if it hasn't got into any dictionaries yet. No doubt it derives from a reanalysis of "versus", but that is how language changes. –  Colin Fine Jul 22 '11 at 12:26
2  
In my experience mostly children say this, who then later learn it is incorrect. Perhaps enough children will never learn it is incorrect, and it will become a part of the language, but I wouldn't make that prediction until I observe many adults say it too. –  nohat Jul 22 '11 at 15:29
    
"To verse" (v.tr.) is hardly a neologism. She tried to verse herself in the rules of football so she wouldn't be embarrassed at her first tailgate party. "To school" has a similar meaning, although one connotes learning through exposure, experience, or self-study, and the other connotes institutional training. Since "to school" has a more colloquial usage of "to best in a fight," the most you can probably hope for is the death of the notion that "I'll verse you" is some kind of backformation of "versus." –  Phil N. Jan 27 '12 at 21:54
    
@PhilN. You refer to a completely different word than the one the OP refers to, which isn't actually verses, but versus. –  sarah Nov 17 '13 at 2:54

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.