This has often stumped me. Not being a world-traveler, I don't know how widespread this pronunciation is, but if anyone knows: where did the r come from?
- Anybody can ask a question
- Anybody can answer
- The best answers are voted up and rise to the top
I looked at spelling in print over the last century. This NGram chart gives the an exaggerated impression of the difference. Usage figures are 160,000 for sherbet, and 28,500 for sherbert.
That's more than 1 in 6 actually writing the r, almost certainly in contravention of what they'd find if they'd looked it up in whatever dictionary they had to hand. One could reasonably assume at least that fraction would say it that way, if not many more.
OP implies the less common form is simply 'wrong', but I see no reason to think this. It's just an alternative spelling associated with alternative pronunciation. So far as I can see, that alternative spelling has been around for several hundred years, so I guess the pronunciation has too.
Another very similar example is the pronunciation perservere for the standard persevere.
This is a famous example of
with a smattering of
The phenomena (not yet an explanation of why) is the addition of a sound (the epenthesis ), and the sound added is by assimilation (specifically progressive assimilation meaning the first sound affects the second).
As to why, well, it doesn't always happen, and in fact the opposite often happens (dissimilation, e.g. apeture for aperture, govenor for governor (note that this is for pronunciation not spelling)). So predicting when it will happen is not so clear. But we know, by the existence of other examples, that the phenomenon is not isolated.
As it comes from the french "sorbet" (sorBAY), there's no logical reason to place an "r" before the "t". It's like saying ChicaRgo. Then again, no reason to make the "s" an "sh". We are just a nation that can not pronounce words from other languages without mangling them. Now that media is so lightning-fast, misspellings and mispronunciations are being legitimized at an incredibly fast rate through sheer mass exposure, so I expect the argument for "sherbert" will grow stronger soon, as people lose the original connection, and the less language-aware and the nonreaders spread the mistakes. See the legitimization of "prolly", "would of", and "alright" as "alternate spellings" instead of just wrong. As soon as enough people get it wrong, it becomes an "alternate spelling" or "alternate usage"....
protected by Jasper Loy Jul 11 '12 at 11:40
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?