Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

As well as being an adjective, fast is an adverb. We use it all the time as such:

He ran fast.

However, though slow is definitely an adjective, it sounds wrong when used as an adverb, because slowly is more common.

He ran slow.

We would always say:

He ran slowly.

My question is, why isn't fast treated the same way as slow; why is there no fastly, while there is a slowly?

share|improve this question
    
Related: Is "fastly" a correct word? –  Kosmonaut Jul 4 '11 at 2:02
1  
Shouldn't this be titled "Why is 'fastly' not a word?" (with no change in any answers needed). –  Mitch Jul 4 '11 at 22:27
    
Most adjectives have adverbial forms, so I agree with Mitch in the opinion that this question would be more useful if it were about "fastly". –  Anicul Nov 8 '11 at 6:22
    
@Anicul: I edited; did you downvote? –  Daniel Nov 8 '11 at 13:12
1  
@drɱ65: Yes. Thank you for editing! I removed my downvote. Also, I agree with Peter in the opinion that fast is only an adjective. –  Anicul Nov 9 '11 at 1:05
show 2 more comments

4 Answers 4

up vote 16 down vote accepted

Because real, living languages have quirks and are never entirely systematic. The "ly" ending is generally indicative of an adverb in English, but not all adverbs end in "ly", and not all words ending in "ly" are adverbs.

Absolute consistency in a language is an indication that the language is a pidgin, a relatively new creole, or an artificial language (like Esperanto or Volapük). Any language that is in everyday use and has been around long enough to gather scratches and dings, will have them.

Quick and fast are both words that may or may not be related to rapidity. In their adjective forms, quick also means living, and fast can mean secure or firm. As an adjective or an adverb having to do with speed, fast seems to have been the result of some strange semantic drift in the period leading up to Middle English.

share|improve this answer
3  
Sir, there isn't a single answer of yours I wouldn't like. You seem like a well educated person and I'm very happy that you're a part of this community. +1 ! –  RiMMER Jul 4 '11 at 2:25
1  
Thanks, but now my hat won't fit, and I need to find other people to share the burden of carrying my ego around :) –  bye Jul 4 '11 at 2:34
    
+1 ... Volapük... –  GEdgar Jul 4 '11 at 20:19
    
In fact, English has acquired so many scratches and dings that it has died. Death occurred on August 21, 2010, and was reported by The Washington Post, where, indeed, the language gave its death rattle. Here is the link to the obit: washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/09/13/… –  Hexagon Tiling Mar 31 '12 at 13:02
add comment

I think this is a special case of the recent discussion of adjectives being substituted for adverbs. As a British ex-pat living in the US when I hear "He ran fast", I hear a bit of that American twang, even though Brits might also say that. I think though that Brits would feel it a little bit of an awkward phrase, and might choose "He ran quickly", but only because their is no appropriate adverbial form of fast. I should say that I think "he ran quickly" doesn't mean exactly the same as "he ran fast" but it is close enough for government work. I should also say that some might say that there is an adverbial form of "fast", being "fast", but that rather begs the question, don't you think?

When I hear "he ran slow" I hear that American twang even more strongly, and would definitely substitute the adverb.

share|improve this answer
1  
It's pretty common nowadays in even only slightly informal speech to drop the '-ly' in adverbs. It may sound "twangy" but I don't think it is is restricted to any particular AmE regional dialect. –  Mitch Jul 4 '11 at 13:46
1  
The Etymonline entry for 'fast' rather thoroughtly disagrees with you about this. According to it, 'fast' in the sense of 'quick' developed as an adverb from Old English or Old Norse, well before the founding of America. –  user1579 Jul 4 '11 at 18:31
    
As an American, I do perceive a difference between "fast" and "quickly". The phrase "He spoke fast," would usually mean he is speaking with high speed, whereas "He spoke quickly", would usually mean "He spoke right away". (Each adverb can take both meanings: "he acted fast" usually means "right away", whereas "he ran quickly" usually means with "high speed".) –  Peter Shor Nov 8 '11 at 12:11
add comment

Well, there is always quickly and rapidly working as equivalents of fast in terms of velocity or speed if you insist on the suffix-ly.

share|improve this answer
1  
I'm sorry, but in both your examples, "slow" is an adjective. –  Daniel Jul 4 '11 at 2:31
    
I updated my answer, and yes I know they are adj. but I provided them as adverbs. I removed the examples so no one will confuse. –  Jamie Jul 4 '11 at 18:25
add comment

The answer is that "slowly" was not the original form. "Slow" is an adv. just as "fast" is. "Slowly" was introduced by classroom instruction that attempted to induce "ly" endings for adverbs as standard.

share|improve this answer
2  
And when would this classroom instruction have happened? Shakespeare (who wrote his plays well before grammar police started infecting classrooms) used both fastly and slowly. –  Peter Shor Mar 4 '12 at 23:57
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.