Process-oriented organizations break down the barriers of structural departments and try to avoid functional silos.
I was wondering what silo means here? Is it a metaphor?
|
|
Yes, silo is being used as a metaphor here, not an actual silo. According to the Oxford Dictionary, there is a literal meaning of silo:
Then there is also the metaphorical meaning:
You can read the dictionary entry for another example of a metaphorical usage. |
||||
|
|
|
I have came across this term when I have had attended a workshop on "Balanced Scorecard" for performance measurement in non-for-profit organizations a few years ago. My study manual for the course put it as this: "A functional group or department within an organization that acts as a silo or island in its lack of interaction with other groups and in not sharing its internal data or processes". |
|||
|
|
|
"Silo" in this context needs to be understood along with the word "functional silo":
"Functional silo" is a technical term, and further explained here why process-oriented organizations particularly one to avoid it:
|
||||
|
|
|
I'd never heard of this metaphor, but Wikipedia has. It's a rather strange (to my thinking) metaphor for isolation: I think the origin of the metaphor is the idea that grain silos don't communicate with each other. |
|||||||||
|
|
Yes, silo is a metaphor. If you think of a grain elevator which is a collection of bins. Every bin could have a unique product and once a product is there it just sits. It should have no interaction with any other silo. The other silos can be emptied shipped refilled with new product, etc. But, it does not affect the silo in question. In an organization, there are people and groups that behave in the same way. There little piece of the world does not interact with the rest of the organization. They make decisions without consideration of how they affect the rest of the business. Like grain silos, they have (and work to maintain) barriers to groups around them. Typically they are perceived as being less interested in the overall success of the organization than to maintaining their normal state. |
|||
|
|
|
Something to do with fermenting seems to be missing in these explanations. It's a fermenting over time, away from the rest of the influences. For good or bad, is another question. |
||||
|
|