English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Why don't we use the indefinite article in "what hassle"?

I think hassle is used as noun here which means "Irritating or inconvenience". What exactly is the problem with "what a hassle" (as hassle is third-person singular)?

share|improve this question
Where did you see "what hassle"? In fact, the normal expression of exasperation at a bothersome task is "what a hassle" ... – Robusto Jul 2 '11 at 19:10
I noticed in a magazine,I am also keen to know why do we use 'a' here while we use 'an' for historian? – Quixotic Jul 2 '11 at 19:15
This is interesting,however :/ – Quixotic Jul 2 '11 at 19:17
And for historian,I am a bit of confused too. – Quixotic Jul 2 '11 at 19:19
Whatever magazine you read it in, "what hassle" is definitely not standard usage. On your historian search, try removing the "what" portion for improved clarity -- j.mp/ngram-a-historian-an-historian -- and then try the same with history: j.mp/ngram-a-history-an-history – Matthew Frederick Jul 2 '11 at 20:21
up vote 3 down vote accepted

As others have mentioned, the common phrase to express annoyance is "what a hassle", similar to "what a nuisance", "what a pain", and so on.

But saying "What hassle" is not entirely ungrammatical, because hassle can be used as an uncountable noun (to mean "hassle as a general concept", rather than a specific instance of it happening) which then cannot take a/an. This would be parallel to such expressions as "What fun!", "What larks" and so on - but as the latter example illustrates, this comes across somewhat stilted and literary.

(As for a versus an, that is well covered elsewhere on this site.)

share|improve this answer
Effectively, OP's question as asked is a bit meaningless. If he'd asked "Why do we use..." it would have made more sense. Whatever - you've covered the whole issue perfectly well, I think. – FumbleFingers Jul 2 '11 at 22:38

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.