English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

This is a follow up to this question: What is the difference between "quicker" and "faster"?

"Quicker" is an adverb, as are "more" (in this context) and "quickly".

So is there a difference besides preference between these?

share|improve this question
Simply: quicker is the comparative form of quick and more quickly is the comparative form of quickly. So the question becomes: what is the difference between the adverbs quick and quickly? I don't believe there is one. – Peter Shor Jun 27 '11 at 23:09
I say use "faster" and "more fastly". ;) +1 to @Peter Shor, though. – Mike Christian Jun 28 '11 at 1:38
up vote 7 down vote accepted

Quicker is the comparative of quick, which is an adjective; more quickly is the comparative of quickly, which is an adverb.

Informally, quick is also used as adverb, with the meaning of "at a fast rate, quickly." These are the examples reported by the NOAD (third edition).

He'll find some place where he can make money quicker.
Get out, quick!

share|improve this answer
When I read that first sample sentence, it sounds awkward to me. The more natural form, to me, is "He'll find some place where he can make money more quickly." Is this simply preference on my part, or can I claim by-the-rules superiority over people who use "quicker" with more than a farcical and preferential basis? ;) – music2myear Jun 28 '11 at 14:12
@music2myear Quick is used as adverb only in informal contexts; it is also possible that usage is limited to specific zones. – kiamlaluno Jun 28 '11 at 17:58
I am usually not concerned with strict grammar, but I think the informal usage of quick as an adverb and therefore quicker as the comparative form of an adverb should not be used. Sentences can become ambiguous if their meaning is the same. – Michael Nov 21 '13 at 21:50

I think quicker is sometimes used as an adjective, but as an adverb both are used to the same effect. From Google's Ngram, it seems that quicker used to be more common but that more quickly is slightly commoner now.

enter image description here

share|improve this answer
This Ngram could be measuring lots of things, including the relative frequency of quicker used as an adjective and adverb. One would never (I hope) say: The hand is more quickly than the eye. – Peter Shor Jun 27 '11 at 23:15
@Peter: true, but if more quickly is now more common than quicker in any sense, then more quickly (which can only be used as an adverb) must now be more common than quicker used as an adverb. – Henry Jun 27 '11 at 23:45
I wish you'd said commoner there! :) – FumbleFingers Jun 28 '11 at 0:00
+1 for an interesting graph. That appeals to my historical interests quite well, possibly illustrating, besides simple usage comparison, the preference for different patterns of speech over the last few centuries. – music2myear Jun 28 '11 at 14:13

As I know that the word 'quick' is as well an adjective and as well an adverb e.g: I am quick in observing(as an adjective) and look quick(as an adverb) so from this sentences we can understand that 'quicker and more quickly' both are correct and are used comparative degree e.g: my cousin writes more quickly/quicker than my friend.

share|improve this answer

protected by tchrist Feb 26 '15 at 2:23

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.