What is the correct word to use here and why:
I will get there quicker [than you]
vs.
I will get there faster [than you]
There must be similar adverbs for "slower".
|
What is the correct word to use here and why:
vs.
There must be similar adverbs for "slower". |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
The definition of the two words makes them synonymous in virtually all cases. However, they do have slightly different connotations that lead to preference in usage. I generally think of something as "fast" if it can achieve a high speed. I think of something as "quick" if it responds rapidly to input. This generally leads to preference of one word over the other in context; "fast" is used in context of speed, while "quick" is used in context of time. So, you would travel fast to get somewhere quickly. In the same vein, "quick" is used to describe the quality of an action that is short and powerful, e.g. a "quick head-fake". "Fast" is generally used to describe actions that are more sustained, e.g. "a fast sprint down the field". None of this is concrete; you hear of someone, say in a race, having "the fastest time" much more often than "the quickest time". Clearly, the context is time, not speed, but use of "fast" is preferred anyway. |
|||||||||
|
|
In sports, fast typically refers to speed and quick is more likely to refer to reflexes.
|
|||
|
|
|
According to the entries in Dictionary.com for fast and quick, they are almost exact synonyms, and neither is incorrect. If you want a quick answer, read no further than this: choose whichever you have heard most or whichever sounds right to you. If you're not sure, remember that you can't go far wrong when you are choosing between fast and quick. To expound, from my experience, I would say that "getting somewhere quicker" is less commonly used than "getting somewhere faster", and if I were to choose between your examples, I would tend toward the more common word faster. A good general rule for colloquial or casual speech or writing is: use the word that is most readily known and understood. The difference between quick and fast is very slight. In your examples, I believe faster is the more usual word; hence I would use it. However, in the sentence "A humane death is quick and painless", fast would not be my choice, because "fast death" is much less common than "quick death". Also, as you have already read, I used the word quick when referring to my shorter answer (higher up). That is because a "fast answer" did not sound as usual to me. In cases like this, in which there are two synonyms being decided between, you have a lot of freedom, and ultimately you ought to choose which, from your experience, is more common, and more readily understood. |
||||
|
Faster is a comparison of speed. (100mph v 120mph) Quicker is a comparison of time. (10min v 20min) In modern conversation they are often used interchangeably. |
|||||||
|
|
Most of the time, there is no difference between Often In sports, one often will say that Person A is In speech related to decisions, |
|||
|
|
|
Quicker means in a smaller amount of time. Faster means at a higher rate of speed. Compare walking to the local store with flying an B1 Bomber to Afghanistan. The first would be quick, it might only take five minutes, but it would be slow because only walk at 3mph. The second would not be quick, it would take 30 hours of flight time, but it would be fast, because you flew near the speed of sound. |
|||
|
|
|
In a 'scientific' context:
A real-life example would be as follows: A car that could travel at 200 mph, but took an hour to get to that speed and had a 0-60mph time of 3 minutes would very fast, but not quick at all. A car that could only travel at a top speed of 60mph, but could go from 0-60mph in half a second would be extremely quick, but not very fast. EDIT: To more directly answer your question... both are correct grammatically, and simply have slightly different connotations. The person who got there 'quicker' may have spent last time traveling. The person who got there 'faster' was traveling at a higher speed. In general, the first one is probably would people MEAN to say, though the second isn't necessarily wrong. |
|||
|
|
|
I personally hear a distinct difference. I could get there faster than you—I will be travelling using a faster method than you - taking a plane instead of a bus for example. I could get there quicker than you—I know a short cut that you do not UPDATE: If I get there faster than you, I will arrive before you. If I get there quicker than you, I may be there at the same time as you, but I spent less time travelling. Again this is my subjective, unsubstantiated feelings on this. |
|||||||||||||
|
|
In that context, they mean the same, but in general fast refers to getting somewhere in the shortest amount of time, whereas quick refers to the ability to change direction in a small amount of time, or to accelerate/decelerate in a small amount of time. from the Online Etymological Dictionary: "fast may apply to rapid motion of any duration, while in quick (in accordance with its original sense of 'live, lively') there is a notion of 'sudden'" |
|||
|
|
|
In common usage, such as basketball, "quick" refers to acceleration while "speed" refers to velocity. |
|||
|
|
|
In general usage, there is no difference in meaning. In this context, both words are referring to arriving at a place in a shorter amount of time. However, to be completely correct, the first sentence should say
While faster is and can be used as both an adverb and and adjective, quicker can be used only as an adjective.
and
|
|||
|
|
This question is protected to prevent "thanks!", "me too!", or spam answers by new users. To answer it, you must have earned at least 10 reputation on this site.