Are poetic contractions, such as "e'er", "o'er" and "ne'er" (and other less common ones), English? As in officially recognized?
|
|
I'm not sure what it means to be "officially recognized" in English; there is no official list of English words. If you mean appearing in dictionaries, then yes, it is a word. (If you mean being employed in speech or everyday writing without sounding odd, then probably not. Its use is restricted to poetry, as you acknowledge.) |
|||||||||||||
|
|
Yes, they're real abbreviated English words, though I wouldn't use them unless I wanted to sound old-fashioned or poetic. What do you mean officially recognised? English has no official arbitrator other than your dictionary of choice; so just check in your favourite dictionary! |
|||||||||||
|
|
These contractions are primarily relegated to literary usage nowadays, and such usage is sparing in modern literature. There is one phrase, however, which enjoys continued popularity in the spoken vernacular:
Some might call it vestigial, but unlike the appendix, it still serves a useful purpose. No synonym carries the freight of implied prescience that this term bears. "Wastrel" rolls deliciously on the tongue, and "good-for-nothing" judges those who are by present accounting utterly useless. But only "ne'er-do-well" pronounces "I have seen into your future, and there is no hope for you." Scathing! |
|||
|
|