English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

With Friends Like These

A few months ago, a couple good friends brought up a topic they know I disdain, and kept prodding me for my opinion on it. They wouldn't let up, until finally I proclaimed "[It's] terrible!", to which they replied, scheming, "Don't you mean horrible?", and I said, "Yeah, horrible!". They both burst out laughing.

Apparently, I pronounce horrible weirdly, and these goofs just wanted to hear me say it¹.

I struggle with IPA, but my understanding is in General American the word is pronounced with a proper o sound, like whore-ible. On the other hand, I pronounce it with an ar sound, like in hard, HARH-ible. They also told me I do the same with orange (arrnje)².

Comparing Oranges to Oranges

In the intervening months, I've polled a bunch of other people, and almost all of them pronounce the o like an o. And their oranges start with the sound in oar.

One issue I have with these comparisons is that I don't think they're truly oranges-for-oranges. I am a native-born New Yorker, and most of my adult relations live here, but were born elsewhere.

So let me give a little background on forces which may have influenced my idiolect:

  • I was born and raised in Manhattan, and have lived most of my adult life on the island (with a couple brief stints in neighboring Jersey City).
  • My father was a Bronx Jew, his parents immigrated from the (newly-formed) Soviet Union, and were bilingual.
  • My mother was raised in rural Connecticut, among working-class Italian immigrants. Her grandparents immigrated at the turn of the 20th century from (northern) Italy. Her parents were quasi-bilingual.
  • My linguistic exposure during my formative years can be broadly characterized as "New York Jews", with a smattering of WASPy 5th Avenue aristocrats (kid I knew in 3rd grade could already trace his family back to the Mayflower).
  • Both my parents had college educations. I have a college education.
  • I speak ludicrously fast. I don't think this is part of my "dialect", per se, just a personal quirk, but I'm wondering if my pronunciations can be explained by subconscious tactics to streamline or re-shape certain words and thereby increase my bandwidth.

Or Is It Just Me?

So, is this a known feature of any particular, documented dialect, sociolect, etc? Has anyone studied its origins (i.e. when it diverged from General American), and what social or linguistic forces might account for it? Or is it really peculiar to me?

I do note that Wiktionary specifically breaks out New York City and Philadelphia in its pronunciation guide for horrible:

(Received Pronunciation) IPA: /ˈhɒɹɪbəl/
(US) IPA: /ˈhɔɹəbəl/, /ˈhɒɹəbəl/, [-bəɫ]
(NYC, Philadelphia) IPA: /ˈhɑɹɪbəl/

which seems like a hint that I may not be as crazy as I sound.

If this is a feature of a known lect, how else does that diverge from General American? What else am I likely to pronounce in a way others find surprising?


¹ Bonus points for anyone who can help me get back at one of them by diagnosing the illness which compels her to pronounce obsessed with all zs, obzezzed (if it helps, she immigrated from Kiev in early childhood and was raised in Northern California. The only other guy I know who does this is also from NoCal.)

² Note to editors: please feel free to update the question to use proper IPA or other formal phonetic transcription.

share|improve this question
1  
Your Kievan friend is using a Slavic habit whereby voicing spreads from an earlier to a later consonant so /bs/ becomes /bz/. Then she goes further and voices the ss because it stands in a fully-voiced environment (bz --ss-- d). – frank May 14 at 10:50
up vote 26 down vote accepted

This is a pretty well-known area of variance among different North American accents of English. It's certainly not unique to you. In this post, I'll use the spelling "ohr" /or/ to represent the sound in in sore, and "ahr" /ɑr/ to represent the sound in star.

However, there are added complications in that some people may distinguish three vowels among glory, sorry, and starry (they are all different in standard British English, for example). So I'll start out by outlining these, and then describe how these vowels area merged in various North American accents.

Accents with a three-way distinction

In British English, words like glory are pronounced with /ɔː/ (the vowel in law), words like sorry are pronounced with /ɒ/ (the vowel in lot), and words like starry are pronounced with /ɑː/ (the vowel in spa).

Usually, Canadian English speakers shift the vowel in lot to /ɑː/, but there is an exception before /r/. So they generally do not shift the vowel in sorry to /ɑː/ Most transcriptions I've found give the vowel in "sorry" as /ɔ/ or /o/; despite this, it seems that some Canadian English speakers still maintain a contrast between the vowels in sorry and glory (with a higher, tenser or longer vowel in the latter word), although both vowels may be shifted a bit compared to British English.

Accents where horrible = hahr-ibble

Accents like yours, where words like sorry and horrible are both pronounced with /ɑr/, are described in this blog post: The Oral-Aural Merger?, by Neal Whitman. Whitman says he sent a message to the American Dialect Society email list asking about dialects like this, and got several responses. Ben Zimmer said that areas where this pronunciation is common include New York City, Philadelphia and the Carolinas.

In 1944, it seems the "ahr" pronunciation was associated with Eastern-Southern American speakers, and the "ohr" pronunciation was associated with Western speakers, according to the research of Charles K. Thomas of Cornell (American Language Supplement 2, H.L. Mencken).

In some accents, even more words have /ɑr/: for speakers with the card-cord merger, words in the "north" lexical set are also pronounced with /ɑr/. These speakers only use /or/ in words like "glory" and "hoarse" that historically had long vowels (this is mentioned by one of the mailing list replies by Matthew J Gordon). (For a longer explanation of the distinction between "north" and "force" lexical sets, see my answer here: Why is 'forty' spelled without a 'u' in Canadian/British English?)

Accents where horrible = hohr-ibble, but sorry = sahr-y

For many other speakers in North America, the vowel in words like horrible has merged in another direction: with the vowel of glory. American English speakers with this merger, like me, say "ohr-ange, hohr-ible," etc. Interestingly, though, this change does not apply in all words: we also say "sahr-ry, sahr-roh, to-mahr-row." That is, we split this set of words into two new sets. Here's a relevant question about this: Where did "sorry" get its vowel sound?

There's a description of this split in this Wikipedia article: North American English Regional Phonology - General American. Apparently, the "ahr" set includes, at a minimum, the four words borrow, tomorrow, sorry, and sorrow. It says more words may be pronounced with "ahr" in the accents of speakers from New York, New Jersey, Philadelphia, and the Carolinas.

Not everybody agrees about which words fall in which set. Based on your described pronunciation of historic and exploratory with "ohr" rather than "ahr," it seems like you actually have a split as well, just a different one from your friends where more words are in the "ahr" set.

The Language Samples Project site that I linked to earlier for the description of Canadian English actually gives two lists. For words pronounced as /ɑr/ by nearly all General American speakers, it gives sorry, tomorrow, borrow, sorrow, and additionally Laura. (In fact, this doesn't seem to be entirely accurate. I pronounce Laura with "ohr," and Peter Shor agrees that this is the most common pronunciation outside of New York.) For words variably pronounced as /ɑr/ by General American speakers (but more commonly pronounced as /or/), it gives Florida, orange, oracle, Norwich, adorable, thesaurus. You pronounce "horrible" with /ɑr/, even though it's not on the second list. In fact, according to Wikipedia and Merriam Webster, the set of words that may be pronounced with /ɑr/ is much more extensive than either of these lists, and seems to potentially include any word that historically had /ɒr/; for example, it lists alternate pronunciations with "ahr" for florist, forest and historic. The sound in words like florist has been discussed on John Wells's phonetic blog (forceful sports supporters), and although he mainly focuses on British pronunciation, there are some interesting comments about variations in American pronunciation.

share|improve this answer
1  
Wow, this is getting really good! I wish I could upvote you once for every edit you've made! – Dan Bron Mar 18 at 21:39
1  
@DanBron: Thanks, there are probably more to come as well! By the way, how do you pronounce "historian," "historic," "explore," and "exploratory"? Do you have a vowel shift between these pairs of words? – sumelic Mar 18 at 21:41
2  
Laura, Laurence? I think your reference is incorrect ... that's another word that's only pronounced as /ɑr/ by New Yorkers, and /ɔɹ/ by nearly everybody else in the U.S. – Peter Shor Mar 18 at 21:46
2  
I've heard "sohrry" and "sahrry" (sounds like sari)… but there's still a contrast with "sore" since "sore" has a lengthened /o:/ and the /o/ in "sorry" is quite short to the point it's almost a [ə] (probably the same Canadian Raising process that also makes y'all think we say "aboot" when it's really just a vowel outside the typical AmE inventory). – SevenSidedDie Mar 19 at 3:05
1  
@MatthewRead: thanks for the data! It seems that this varies among regions and individuals in both countries. – sumelic Mar 19 at 3:23

Pronouncing the words horror, horrible, and horrid (not to mention quarter) with the same vowel as sorry and starry is very common in New York City and its surrounding suburbs — in fact, it's kind of a give-away that identifies you as coming from that area (i.e., a shibboleth).

So if you don't want to identify yourself as from New York City, change your pronunciation. If you still live in New York City, you can make fun of your friends for not speaking the local dialect.

share|improve this answer
2  
Thanks, though I think I'd have to change ... a bit more than my pronunciation. I'd have to learn to drive a car, for one thing. And I promise you I will never wait for a light to change before crossing a street (which, bonus, makes traveling to other cities ... thrilling). – Dan Bron Mar 18 at 21:36
3  
@Dan: and you probably think that people who wear brown suits are hicks. I had this conversation with a New Yorker once—I observed that in New York City, people only wear blue, gray, and black suits. He said that it's well-known that people who wear brown suits are hicks. I replied that if you walk through downtown Chicago on a business day, you see tons of brown suits. And his answer was that "there are lots of hicks in Chicago." – Peter Shor Mar 18 at 21:37
4  
Haha, don't be silly. I think everyone are hicks. – Dan Bron Mar 18 at 21:37
1  
I'm from southeastern Pennsylvania, and around here too these vowels are perfectly assonant: porridge, incorrigible, horrid, horrible, sorry, starry, orange... – TRomano Mar 18 at 23:00
    
And we often tend to have -i- or -eh- in unaccented syllables where the pronouncer on the spelling bee puts schwas. – TRomano Mar 18 at 23:07

English has so few vowel letters that 'o' represents both o-micron and O-mega. Most long-o words will use a vowel pair ('oa', 'o'+silent 'e', etc.), so your pronunciation may be closer to the original.

share|improve this answer
1  
I am not so interested in who is "closer to the original" as I am in divergence from the "most popular" or common (AmE) pronunciation. I'd be very interested in answers which identify my dialect and detail its quirks, from a linguistic / phonetic perspective. I'm looky for really wonky / word-nerdy details. – Dan Bron Mar 18 at 21:21
    
What do you mean by 'English' and 'vowel'? Do you mean the 'Roman alphabet' and 'letters'? That would make sense, given that the Roman letter 'o' can represent many different sounds English pronunciation. – Mitch Mar 19 at 14:06
    
I apologize for using 'English' instead of 'Modern Latin alphabet', and 'vowel' instead of 'vowel letter [grapheme]'. Although o='aw' is AmE in 'horrible', and o='ah' in Dan's pronunciation, I hear o='oh' in MN, despite the double 'r'. – AmI Mar 31 at 19:11

Please excuse me if I am missing the mark entirely, here. But, as I understand it, you are attempting to somehow categorize regional dialects?

While I have no etymological experience, I can simply say that all 'dialects,' as well as mispronunciations of words simply fall back on mouth, lip, and tongue positioning. I call it "lazy mouth," when the lips fall open, making more of an 'ah' sound, rather than the lips closing more, into an 'oh' sound. The 'sss' sound, rather than the 'zzz' sound is one of how much air is being forced past the tongue as it rests up in your mouth at the front of your upper palate.

Any dialect can be learned by the simple repositioning of your mouth, lips, and tongue. This is how Renee Zellweger, an actress from Texas, was able to portray the character of Bridget Jones, a Londoner.

share|improve this answer
1  
If you knew me, you'd likely call my mouth anything but lazy. :) – Dan Bron Mar 20 at 11:44

protected by tchrist May 14 at 14:00

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.