English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

While discussing What does "I was had" mean? I've found there are some not so common usages of had in English like:

I have/had been had

(meaning "to get fooled")

but further Google search exposed even constructions like

I am been had

or even

I am had

and of course

I was had

from the question above. Are all of those grammatically correct? Can you give me some usage examples?

share|improve this question
up vote 5 down vote accepted

I am been had

This is a very odd construction. Of the four hits that Google offers two are obvious solecisms and one is a double that uses it as a literal translation from another language.

I am had

This is also awkward. Possibly it had a use once, but today it would be at least archaic if not downright wrong.

I was had.

Along with "I've been had," this is acceptable grammatically and means the speaker was swindled or deceived by someone.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.