Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Possible Duplicate:
“Can hardly wait” versus “can't hardly wait”

These two seem to be opposites of each other because of the additional "not" in one of them. However, they seem to be interchangeable. Are they? What's the difference?

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by Alain Pannetier Φ, mplungjan, Marthaª, Callithumpian, Thursagen Jun 23 '11 at 21:37

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

    
    
Downvoted because it's a duplicate (link above). –  Henrik N Jun 23 '11 at 21:10
    
Strange it did not show up when it was composed –  mplungjan Jun 23 '11 at 21:11

2 Answers 2

up vote 2 down vote accepted

The correct version here in "can hardly". This is what anyone who uses either phrase likely means, at least.

While "cannot hardly" is grammatically correct, it is effectively a double negative, and thus its meaning is confusing at best, plain wrong at worst. Translate it as "I am nearly unable to do ..." and you should see why its meaning is not the same. Sure, it could be used correctly in some contexts (the exact opposite of "can hardly"), but I'd posit that almost all of its colloquial usage is wrong; a bit like "I don't want nothing".

share|improve this answer

While people use them in the same way, this is not correct.

Can Hardly is the correct way.. as in "I can hardly wait to get there."

Saying "I can't hardly wait to get there." is effectively saying I can wait. It is a double negative and "not" and "hardly" cancel one another out.

share|improve this answer
    
Yeah, nice jog of rephrasing my asnwer. ;) –  Noldorin Jun 24 '11 at 1:22
    
Yours wasn't up when I started replying. :P –  DKGasser Jun 24 '11 at 11:31
    
Well 10 minutes after I posted mine, I still didn't see yours, so it must have took you a darn long time to write that hah. –  Noldorin Jun 24 '11 at 13:41
    
Seeing as SE says they were posted 5 minutes apart, I find that highly unlikely. Apologies if you feel slighted, I wasn't rehashing what you said with any knowledge of what you had said. –  DKGasser Jun 27 '11 at 19:28
    
No, my bad. I could have sworn it was a lot longer, but fair enough. You're quite in your right to leave your answer if it was only 5 mins. I sometimes do the same / sometimes delete mine, so fair enough. –  Noldorin Jun 27 '11 at 21:11

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.