Are there rules of usage when using the ampersand "&" instead of "and"?
Are they completely interchangeable?
The ampersand seems more casual, but I'm not sure.
There are very, very few acceptable uses of & in proper written English. Here are some of them:
& is especially common when joining names to indicate a firm or a partnership, for example, a law firm:
In abbreviations, when abbreviating "and", & is often used:
One rare usage is on envelopes addressed to a couple:
&c. is a rare and somewhat archaic looking abbreviation for etc.
Other than that it is vanishingly rare to see & in formal written English, although of course in informal email, text messages, notes, and handwriting, anything goes.
I looked through a couple of reference books and both of them said that the ampersand should only be used in company names.
Meaning-wise I think they are.
It's an abbreviation so one might use it more in less formal writing.
I cannot say this is correct but in use I find it very useful.
I often use "&" when two things are related directly but only in a series. Example: "Michel has experience in Marketing, Research & Design, and Business Management."
Like I said, this most likely isn't correct but it makes sense, seems useful, and if enough people agree then we can change the rules & regulations.
The ampersand is used inside brackets whem regerencing (Smith & Jones, 2008:36). But in a sentence and will be used, e.g. Smith and Jones (2008:36) hold that....... also & is used in the refetence list of an academic paper when more than one author is cited. But not in the title - then you use and. Hope it helps. Jo.
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?