If "errored" is not a valid word, then how should I say:
The program errored at line 44
I guess I could say:
The program threw an error at line 44
But why is "errored" wrong? Is there a better alternative?
|
If "errored" is not a valid word, then how should I say:
I guess I could say:
But why is "errored" wrong? Is there a better alternative? |
||||
|
You can actually say "The program erred at line 44", but it's not very idiomatic. "Err" also occurs in the saying "To err is human, to forgive is divine". If you're looking for the correct idiom, you could say "the program encountered an error at line 44" or "the program hit an error at line 44", etc. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
I've seen it enough in computing contexts that I consider it acceptable there. I wouldn't use it in other domains myself, though, except possibly in a geeky tongue-in-cheek way (e.g., "my DVD player errored out on that scratched disk.") |
|||
|
|
|
I'd say errored IS a valid word. It's the past tense of the verb "to error". I've seen (well, mostly heard) this word used to mean
This is a relatively recent usage of the word (I can't find any authoritative samples of it) it might be considered too informal or slangy. Also, some people might not be sure what precisely you are trying to say. Thus, you should describe more fully what the program is doing.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
To use "errored" you would have to consider error a verb, but the dictionary doesn't. "Error" is a noun, used to mean mistake. You wouldn't say "The program mistaked at line 44." Your usage "threw an error" is correct, because it uses error as a noun. |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
You may choose one of the following options:
|
|||||
|
|
|
Within programming circles, I'd say that "errored" is a perfectly fine term to use. It seems to be fairly widely understood as a verb form for "error". Outside of computing, I'd probably avoid it. You generally won't hear someone say "Todd errored on his test". It's a field-specific bit of terminology. That being said, while discussing things within the field of computing, I'd prefer "the program errored/failed/crashed" over "erred", as some others have suggested. Any of those would be concise and make sense. I would also prefer the options above over "The program threw an error" in informal settings, simply for the fact that it's less wordy, unless the focus of the statement was how exactly the program did the throwing. In technical documents, "threw an error" might be preferable to "errored". |
|||||||||
|
|
You can say
though I'd be more inclined to use "caused", as "threw" sounds a little odd (though it is used in the context of exceptions in C++). (You might also want to provide a more information than merely saying that an error has occurred!) |
|||||
|
|
Personally, I prefer to say "the program failed at line 44", although I really like "the program erred at line 44" as suggested by Shinto Sherlock above :). |
|||
|
|
|
Outside of the context of computer programs. errored is common expression in legal documents. For example, "We find the lower court erred in finding Larry Flint guilty of causing undue pain and suffering of Jerry Falwell" |
|||||||
|
|
Right click on the word. Select Add to Dictionary. Error is defined as a Noun, but we use it as a Verb, in another 10 years or so the Language Police will see the error in their ways, and allow us to use it as a Verb as well as a Noun, like Googling. |
|||
|
|
This question is protected to prevent "thanks!", "me too!", or spam answers by new users. To answer it, you must have earned at least 10 reputation on this site.
erroredor for that mattererror-ed... – Vineet Menon Apr 6 '12 at 5:11