English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Possible Duplicate:
“If I was” or “If I were”. Which is more common, and which is correct?

" If it were possible, and it were possible to do..."

that sounds wrong, shouldn't we have was after it?

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by Robusto, Kit Z. Fox, kiamlaluno, Marthaª, FumbleFingers Jun 16 '11 at 16:17

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

english.stackexchange.com/questions/15510/… also explains this and links to related questions. – aedia λ Jun 16 '11 at 15:53

"Was" is the "helper" for the "simple past" passive tense in the third person. Therefore, as the phrase "it was possible" is grammatically correct in simple past passive, you can use it.

However, it is also correct to use "were" in the "second conditional" for the first and third person singulars as well as the second person singular and all plurals. So in addition to "if you were" and "if they were", the phrases "if I were" and "if he/she/it were" are also correct.

So, short answer, they're both right in this case, because the usage of "was/were" as the past participle is both in the second conditional and in the past simple passive.

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.