English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I know some words like unclothe and disrobe but these verbs refer to taking clothes off, I'm looking for a more accurate verb antonym of the verb equip, meaning taking weapons off.

More Context

In a video game, imagine you equip your agent with firearms and send him/her for a duel, after fight finished, her/his weapon may run out of bullets and will be automatically ______.
I need to inform the gamer that his/her agent is ______ and needs to be equipped again before any other gamer attacks you.

share|improve this question
8  
If you are talking about weapons, the verb disarm is often used to mean "remove weapons from [someone else]." If the person is taking off his or her own weapon, you might say "removing [one's] knife/pistol/whatever and putting it down [somewhere]." – Sven Yargs Jan 7 at 6:52
    
@SvenYargs the Remove verb causes doubt that is it removed entirely from inventories (needs to buy it again) or only unequipped (only needs to equip it again after the weapon cooled down) – ali haghighatkhah Jan 7 at 6:57
    
I'll note that a more specific word than equip for referring specifically to equipping a weapon would be wield. So an antonym for wield might be a suitable answer to this question as well. – Dan Henderson Jan 7 at 17:48
1  
@SomethingDark Thank you all for your kind help. I've added more details about the situation. Hope it clears the right answer – ali haghighatkhah Jan 8 at 5:48
2  
You can't make such a radical edit like that. It practically invalidates SomethingDark's answer. Now your question contains the word "unequipped", any visitor who sees that question and then reads the top (and accepted) answer is going to ask themself, why did that user repeat the same word used in OP. A similar edit should have been done much earlier on, because it gives CONTEXT and helps users provide the answer you need. Please replace the term unequipped with a blank space e.g. ....run out of bullets and will be automatically _______. I need to... – Mari-Lou A Jan 8 at 7:46
up vote 39 down vote accepted

Video games usually say unequip.

unequip (v) - 1. To remove equipment. 2. (video games) In role-playing video games, to deactivate an item being carried by a player.

share|improve this answer
6  
@alihaghighatkhah - it definitely works as a verb as well, I just can't find a good source other than "I'm a native English speaker." – SomethingDark Jan 7 at 6:23
12  
+1. No dictionary hits for unequip, but it would be recognised by the majority of native English speakers, especially gamers of any kind. – AndyT Jan 7 at 9:06
2  
In a gaming context I always simply used "remove". It clearly makes sense for items that would be equipped by being worn, and worked well enough for weapons that might be in different places (in hand, on back, in holster, etc.) depending on state of use too. – R.. Jan 7 at 19:49
1  
Aren't we supposed to downvote made-up words? Why is this both the most popular and the accepted answer? – talrnu Jan 7 at 22:25
1  
@talrnu "made-up words" means words that the answerer made up. – NobodyNada Jan 8 at 5:34

Disarm

verb (used with object)

to deprive of a weapon or weapons.

verb (used without object)

to lay down one's weapons.

share|improve this answer
13  
Note that disarm can and often will be used to mean removing the equipment from someone else. "She disarmed him." – SuperBiasedMan Jan 7 at 11:43
2  
Based on OP's description of "taking weapons off" I think that Disarm is the most appropriate. Before entering through the security checkpoint, the Hitman disarmed himself. – MonkeyZeus Jan 7 at 18:03

If the weapon currently being equipped is being returned to a holder that the individual is wearing, then depending on the weapon type we have a few choices:

  • If it's a firearm you would holster it.
  • If it's a blade, then you'd sheathe it.

If you're putting it into a more general storage location, such as a backpack, then you could be said to stow it.

If you're simply dropping it to the ground, well, I'd say drop is as good a word as any.

share|improve this answer
1  
Holster and sheathe would be the opposite of 'draw', not equip. You would need to have the weapon equipped to do any of those things. – DCShannon Jan 8 at 0:17

Consider, unarm

To divest of armor or arms; disarm.

American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fifth Edition

share|improve this answer

Although rare, 'disequip' is a good transitive and intransitive verb with the meaning you intend:

diseˈquip, v.
rare.
trans. To divest (any one) of his equipment; intr. (for refl.) to doff one's equipment.
1831 F. A. Kemble Jrnl. in Rec. Girlhood (1878) III. 23 [He] arrived just as we had disequipped.

["diseˈquip, v.". OED Online. December 2015. Oxford University Press. http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/54283?rskey=BNKRlP&result=1&isAdvanced=false (accessed January 07, 2016).]

This verb is admirably suited for a 'disrarity' upon frequent use by gamers.

Some 'Dis'ambiguation and Other Notes in Response to OP Edits, Etc.

I used 'dis'ambiguation rather than 'un'ambiguation in the heading because I'm, most precisely, taking the ambiguity away rather than negating it. That's the difference between 'dis-' and 'un-'.

  1. If by "more accurate" you mean 'more commonly used in a given context', then 'disequip' might not the word for you; in the language of gamers, 'unequip' is by far the most commonly used word for the sense you describe, at least for the time being.

  2. If by "more accurate" you mean 'better suited to and more expressive of the concept intended', then 'disequip' might be the most accurate word to use, or perhaps 'deactivate', as shown next.

A commonly used verb, and accurate for the sense I understand you to intend, is 'deactivate':

trans. To render inactive ....

(op. cit.)

share|improve this answer
2  
I'd argue that 'good' and 'rare' here are not totally compatible. – Edwin Ashworth Jan 7 at 9:33
    
Which is the more correct form: unequip as @somethingdark said or disequip as you said? – ali haghighatkhah Jan 7 at 20:45
4  
@alihaghighatkhah As a native english speaker, I unequip relatively frequently. I have never heard disequip. I would use unequip. – S. Buda Jan 7 at 21:58
1  
@JEL It's generally a good idea to use an "inept contrived" word over an existing apt word when it's far more commonly used and understood. Just because disequip technically exists and dis- is technically a better suited prefix doesn't mean you should use it, because that's now how language works. Disequip gives 1 600 hits on google, unequip gives 376 000. Seems like disequip will be a pretty ostentatious choice in this case. – Tobberoth Jan 8 at 7:40
1  
@JEL Meaning and language is exactly a "democracy" as you aptly put it. This is why there are exceptions in languages. As much as linguists love to put clear rules and perfectly define meanings, it's completely unrealistic because languages evolve with no concern of their efforts. If everyone today decided that "duck" from now on means "fish", that's what it will mean, etymology be damned. Take the word "awful" which used to mean "full of awe" in a positive sense, are you going to claim people who use awful in a negative sense are using the wrong word? Of course not. – Tobberoth Jan 8 at 12:00

Strip works too. You can strip someone of a thing.

share|improve this answer

I don't think it's a real word, but "dequip" comes to mind...

share|improve this answer
    
This is an unhelpful answer. There are two reasons. 1. The answer states that dequip might not be a commonly understood word. 2. The answer doesn't explain anything about how to use the word. Given 1. that makes 2. very important. 1. is bad because the answer should address the question for people who don't know the answer and this answer implies that the word shouldn't be used, because dequip might not be a word people know, while also implying that the word should be used because it is posted as an answer. – Matt E. Эллен Jan 14 at 12:21

Pillaged, looted, stripped. There could be degrees of lack.

share|improve this answer
    
Welcome to EL&U. Your answer was flagged for its length and content. It is not encouraged to post an answer without any research/reference/link that can support it. Please edit your answer after taking the tour and visiting our help center for additional guidance. – Rathony Jan 8 at 7:16
    
Please don't give multiple options without giving a way for the asker to discern between them. – Matt E. Эллен Jan 13 at 9:44

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.