English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

If I’m citing a poem or quotation, what kind of dash precedes the author’s name?
For example:

This Business of Printing; which I am heartily tired of, and repent I e’er attempted.... 

—John Baskerville

Should this be an em dash, an en dash, or something else?
And should there be a space between the dash and the author’s name?

share|improve this question
possible duplicate of When should I use an em-dash, an en-dash, and a hyphen? – FumbleFingers Feb 26 '12 at 21:13

Given these choices:

U+2010 ‭ ‐  HYPHEN
U+2012 ‭ ‒  FIGURE DASH
U+2013 ‭ –  EN DASH
U+2014 ‭ —  EM DASH
U+2212 ‭ −  MINUS SIGN

The right answer is actually U+2015, whose alternate name is indeed “quotation dash”. Failing that, you are supposed to use U+2014. This is very common in Romance languages, BTW, using a quotation dash for speech quotes.

Note that even Bringhurst, who isn’t a fan of the long em dash, rightly says to use two of them for bibliographical entries. The recently released Unicode 6.1 has given us two more dashes to help with this:

share|improve this answer
In following wikipedia entry it has been explained that "quotation dash" is used instead of "quotation mark" before the quotation, but there is nothing about "quotation attribution": en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… – Ali Shakiba Jul 4 '12 at 19:43
Thanks for these! – Epitorial Feb 5 '13 at 15:37
It seems to me that an argument could be made for an en dash—you're connecting the quote to its author. – inxilpro Jan 16 '15 at 22:57

I assume the style to which you are adhering, if any, does not prescribe a specific type of dash, and therefore this is a matter of personal preference and aesthetics. I would definitely not use an en-dash; I reserve en-dashes strictly for (usually numerical) ranges. Therefore, I would prefer to use an em-dash. I personally never put spaces around em-dashes—e.g., when using them to enclose a parenthetical phrase—so I would suggest not using a space.

You might get some more answers by cross-posting this question to http://tex.stackexchange.com/ (a StackExchange site dedicated to typesetting).

Edit: I am dismayed to report that it appears as if StackExchange uses an en-dash in comment signatures. This is a grievous error! We should all file bug reports! ;-)

share|improve this answer
Nice answer. Personally I differ in my use of spaces, but if there isn't a style guide specifying otherwise that's just a matter of taste. – user1579 Jun 7 '11 at 12:51
The spaces are a matter of taste. The reason why I don't use spaces is that many word processors and typesetting languages will often allow a line break between a word and a subsequent dash if there is a space in between, which I don't like. As long as one is consistent in the spacing throughout the document, though, it doesn't really matter. – ESultanik Jun 7 '11 at 14:07
You can use a NO-BREAK SPACE (U+00A0). – fumoboy007 Aug 23 '14 at 5:21

I have been searching for the same as the OP. More searching has revealed this in the U.S. Government Printing Office Style Manual (I have not read the whole of it, so I might be misinterpreting it):

16.17. Signatures, preceded by an em dash, are sometimes run in with last line of text.

share|improve this answer

Yes that's an em dash. You don't need a space.

Let a dash precede the reference (author, title of work, or both) following a direct quotation.

share|improve this answer

Please use a dash longer than the normal hyphen to distiguish it from the hyphen between word parts (like in "stand-up") and certainly add a space between dash and name for readability.

share|improve this answer
i'm new here - and just curious why somebody voted my answer down... – halloleo Jun 7 '11 at 3:20
I'm not the one who down-voted you, so I can't tell you why it happened, however, it may be because the question is asking which of the longer-than-the-normal-hyphen dashes should be used (e.g., en-dash vs. em-dash), not just whether they should be used. – ESultanik Jun 7 '11 at 12:42
thx ESultanik. makes (sort of) sense. – halloleo Jun 9 '11 at 2:49
All dashes are longer than a hyphen. – tchrist Oct 1 '13 at 20:45

I think the answer to this question comes down to your interpretation of the word "cite." Are you writing an academic paper that requires a certain style (APA, MLA, etc..) or are you just typing up a quotation you really like to put up on the wall? If the latter, it should be fine the way you have it posted here. I don't think there is a standard for personal use, it is just a stylistic choice really. Just do it the way that looks best to you. Otherwise, if its for an academic paper, just "google" the citation style and "poem" and you will get a plethora of info on how to do that.

share|improve this answer

One en-dash.

A hyphen is wrong. An em-dash would definitely be wrong. Two en-dashes are never right in any circumstance, though two hyphens can be used to indicate an em-dash when the font does not support extended characters or is monospaced (or you don't know how to produce such a character).

share|improve this answer

protected by tchrist Jul 1 '14 at 1:07

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.