English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

As I'm no native speaker, I wonder about the usage for compensate. I'm writing a title of a paper. Is it:

"Compensating for X Effects"


"Compensating X Effects" ?

In this case I want to express that the methods introduced in the paper decrease/get rid off the "X effects". The second one sounds to me as if the "effects" would get some kind of compensation. Yet, I'm not sure.

share|improve this question
I think you might want to check the precise definition of compensate. It definitely doesn't mean get rid of. You might be better off sticking to decrease, or similar (reduce, counteract, etc.), where at least you already know the word. – FumbleFingers Jun 3 '11 at 20:14
up vote 2 down vote accepted

The New Oxford American Dictionary has an example of the meaning you're using:

[among others]
• act to neutralize or correct (a deficiency or abnormality in a physical property or effect): the output voltage rises, compensating for the original fall.

It used transitively to mean “recompense someone for loss, suffering, or injury” (same source). Example: Pakistan to Compensate Victims of U.S. Airstrike.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.