Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In many mathematics papers I read sentences like "...with an appeal to Theorem 4.5 we get...".

Is the capitalization of theorem in this case correct? If it is correct why do we capitalize the word?

share|improve this question
    
possible duplicate of Which words in a title should be capitalized? –  Robusto Jun 3 '11 at 11:03
    
@Robusto: closely related, IMHO, but not actually a duplicate. –  user1579 Jun 3 '11 at 12:39
    
@Rhodri: Yeah, you're proably right. I took the term title in a broader sense. –  Robusto Jun 3 '11 at 12:42
1  
This would seem better answered by people at math.SE. Even though the question is about English usage, it is localized to their particular culture. –  Mitch Jun 3 '11 at 13:15
1  
@Mitch: it's relevant to more than just maths textbooks. Consider how it applies to Figure 3 or Table B.1 –  user1579 Jun 3 '11 at 15:19
show 1 more comment

3 Answers

up vote 5 down vote accepted

I think this is a matter of style. There's no reason internal references to theorems shouldn't be treated the same way as chapters. The grammatical reason for capitalizing them would be that they are specific designators, but it's somewhat of a judgment call as to whether they are. Here, Google Ngrams come in very handy. If you look at whether people capitalize Chapter 3, they usually do:

enter image description here

And they capitalize Theorem 3 a slightly higher percentage of the time.

enter image description here

Google Ngrams also shows that very few people would capitalize page 3.

share|improve this answer
    
I would have expected a bigger change about the time TeX was introduced - perhaps journals used to edit/retype papers more. –  mgb Jun 3 '11 at 15:18
1  
I wonder what this actually shows. To me this only shows that "Theorem" is more often used than "theorem" but not that "Theorem" is the correct usage. –  Jonas Teuwen Jun 3 '11 at 17:12
2  
@Jonas T: If usage doesn't define what's correct for this question, what does? –  Peter Shor Jun 3 '11 at 18:20
    
@Martin: I expect the use of TeX caught on gradually, between 1980 and 1990. There's a fairly steep upward slope in the use of the capitalized Theorem during that period, which may correspond to this. –  Peter Shor Jun 3 '11 at 18:24
1  
@Peter: Okay, maybe I don't know how the rules in English are made but to me saying that it is correct because more people use it is an ad populum fallacy. –  Jonas Teuwen Jun 4 '11 at 22:38
show 2 more comments

Theorem 4.5 is the title of the item in your book. You would refer to it in the same way that you would refer to a chapter or section of the book, or the name of another book, by reproducing the same capitalization as the title's original appearance.

It looks unusual because we are used to making other references within the same book by chapter number (or page number, or whatever), rather than by title. This is purely a matter of convenience; you have a general idea of where "chapter two" is where you'd probably have to look up "Elliptical Integrals". It just happens that in this case the title contains a number.

share|improve this answer
    
Very nice answer. Indeed, we capitalize Table 4.3 because it's a title. You can see this with Google Ngrams, by checking that 'See Table' is much more common than 'See table' (usually part of a construction like See Table 4.3); while 'See Table on' is much less common than 'See table on' (usually part of a construction like See table on page 77). –  Peter Shor Jun 3 '11 at 15:38
    
I don't really understand this answer. If I write "Theorem 4.5." I would capitalize it because it is the first word in "sentence". This is the original appearance of the title, what am I missing? –  Jonas Teuwen Jun 3 '11 at 15:54
    
@Peter: thank you very much for the links; I'm afraid I've never learned how to work Google Ngrams, but it is a good tool for showing this particular distinction! –  user1579 Jun 3 '11 at 15:54
    
@Jonas: sorry, I don't think I was very clear in my haste. By "original appearance" I meant where it occurs, not what it looks like. Think of it as the title of the sub(sub(sub...))section in which the theorem itself appears. Unfortunately I don't have time to rewrite the answer properly at the moment, since my downloads are all finished and I need to get on with some work! I'll see if I can put something better together this evening. –  user1579 Jun 3 '11 at 16:00
add comment

In this case, it is correct to capitalize Theorem 4.5. The reason is because the Theorem 4.5 is actually the name of the theorem.

The rule for capitalization is to capitalize proper names, so names of theorems need to be capitalize.

share|improve this answer
    
Why are things like "Theorem 4.5" and so on proper nouns? They are not the same throughout all texts. It is not something like "Pythagoras' Theorem" which is the same througout all texts. –  Jonas Teuwen Jun 3 '11 at 12:45
    
I must disagree with this answer. One does not say "Go to Page 5." Since it's a simple enumeration, "theorem 1" is really an abbreviation for "the first theorem" or "the theorem [which is] numbered 1." –  Quadrescence Jun 3 '11 at 12:51
    
@Jonas: "London" (or "George") is not less of a proper noun simply because there are multiple possible referents. –  Ben Voigt Jun 5 '11 at 2:34
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.