Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I saw both versions ("in figure" and "on figure"), however---what is more correct? And is there any difference?

EDIT: In scientific papers, standards and other publications, "figures" can be found. They are also denoted as "pictures" sometimes (informally). When someone wants to refer to a part of a figure, he or she can write either "in figure" or "on figure". I am interested in figuring out if there is any difference in these two cases.

share|improve this question
This comparison is meaningless without context. –  Robusto May 29 '11 at 16:31

2 Answers 2

The standard is "in". From a random article on my desk:

...and isoamyl alcohol designated in Figure 2 were used...

Figures, as graphical elements, use the same terminology as other graphical items: in a painting, in a photograph, in your web browser.

Incidentally, even more common is to not use "in" (or "on") at all:

...did not migrate to 0.03 M sodium chloride (Fig. 2A, right).

share|improve this answer

"in the figure" is the exact way to write in the scientific papers.

share|improve this answer
Please try to add some references/sources to your answer to increase its veracity. It would also help if you could add your experiences therein. –  Mohit Dec 5 '13 at 9:53

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.