English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I saw the following lead copy of today’s New York Times (May 24) article titled, “Union Effort Turns Its Focus to Target “

“The retailer's employees are unhappy with about low wages and short workweeks.”

I have a simple question. Do we need “about” after "with"? Isn't this redundant?

share|improve this question
up vote 15 down vote accepted

It looks like a simple mistake. Writer originally wrote with, and changed it to about, but forgot to delete the unwanted word.

Disregarding whether that conjecture is actually what happened, there's no question but that using both words is incorrect. As music2myear says, there are semantic/grammatic reasons for preferring about; it may be these are what caused the writer to change his wording. However, it's worth pointing out that over the last 100 years there has been a significant shift in favour of with...

my ngram

share|improve this answer

I believe the proper word would be "about", in the sense of the writer meaning "...are unhappy concerning low wages...". "with" is a preposition indicating proximity, which, while it is commonly (ab)used colloquially like this, is not the intended meaning.

share|improve this answer
Check out this NGram, showing that things have changed a lot in recent decades. You can't argue the rights and wrongs against that many writers. ngrams.googlelabs.com/… – FumbleFingers May 24 '11 at 22:27
@FumbleFingers: I use it myself and recognize it's legitimacy in our evolving language. But if you are looking for the correct usage, let us agree on the original meaning as the goal and accept the newer usages as less than the goal. – music2myear May 25 '11 at 14:00
I take your point and will edit my answer accordingly. In this particular case the writer presumably agreed with you, if my conjecture about the 'undeleted' first choice is correct. Not that I think either word is really 'wrong' today, but both together definitely is. – FumbleFingers May 25 '11 at 15:04

I feel that about is to imply around the low, not exactly low.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.