Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

For years I have used '=>' as a sign meaning 'should be changed to' and I have long since forgotten whether this is a personal idiosyncrasy or an actual existing usage.

e.g. "in the sentence above word 'jive' => 'jibe.'"

Is this familiar usage to anyone? Anyone else besides me, I mean.

share|improve this question
    
I use this sign as "result". –  user8568 May 23 '11 at 15:56
    
    
@RegDwight, hm, don't see => or ⇒ there. –  Unreason May 23 '11 at 16:08
    
More anecdotal tales: I wouldn't know that this symbol meant anything in particular without context. The full sentence "In the sentence above, jive => jibe" provides enough context for me to know what was meant. –  MrHen May 23 '11 at 16:47
    
@Unreason: precisely my point. –  RegDwigнt May 23 '11 at 17:10

4 Answers 4

The usage is familiar to me also, but I don't know accepted it is. I don't know the approved editorial marks for paper proofreading (proofreading marks, but I've used '=>' in electronic text to say what I think should be done.

Which is to say, it is a reasonable symbol to mean "should be changed to", but therer is no official support for it that I know of.

('=>' has a technical but unrelated meaning in mathematical logic for a very specific kind of implication)

share|improve this answer

Are you sure it is not → [->] rather than ⇒ [=>]? The first one usually mean to substitute in place of the other.

share|improve this answer
4  
Arjang, the LaTeX formatting plug-in is very resource-intensive, and is only turned on for SE sites that need it. EL&U sometimes needs fancy characters, but not fancy formatting, and fancy characters can be achieved in many much simpler ways than LaTeX. –  Marthaª May 23 '11 at 20:19

In a regular text, I'd simply take it to mean changes/changed into, just like any random arrow, without any sense of desirability. Your particular interpretation is unfamiliar to me, and I believe it is not generally so used. Practice may be different in specific fields.

Of course you could indicate a desirable change with it, but I don't believe this desirability is inherent in the symbol.

As Unreason says, it means implication in formal logic: p => q means "if p, then q", just as p <=> q means "if p, then q; and if q, then p".

share|improve this answer

In logic it is used for implication:

p implies q is denoted with p enter image description here q

share|improve this answer
    
Even outside of mathematics, the only sense I've known this symbol to be used for is "implies". –  Orbling May 23 '11 at 17:50
    
And other fields of maths, and also science, whether the user is thinking about implication (semantically/syntactically) or just some loose idea of deduction. –  Nicholas Wilson May 23 '11 at 18:52

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.