Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Possible Duplicate:
Order of “not” with infinitive

The following are both accepted as grammatically correct, right?

You pretend to not notice.

You pretend not to notice.

However, if I think about it, it seems like the first one is correct but not the second. Why would that be?

It's almost as if the second one is saying "You don't pretend to notice," which means something different from the first.

share|improve this question
add comment

marked as duplicate by PLL, psmears, F'x, kiamlaluno, RegDwigнt May 23 '11 at 10:09

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

2 Answers

up vote 6 down vote accepted

Both forms are grammatically correct.

In this example, I slightly prefer the second — it flows a little better, to my ear; and pragmatically, people who believe that split infinitives are Wrong might hold the first form against you.

The second form doesn’t seem ambiguous to me in this example, since I pretend not isn’t an idiomatic way to negate I pretend in modern English. There are analogous examples where it certainly would be ambiguous, though; for instance:

My intention in writing this is not to offend grammarians.

Here, not could be negating either was or to offend, giving two quite different meanings: perhaps I have some quite unrelated intention, or perhaps I’m specifically trying to be inoffensive. So in this case, to give the latter meaning, I should rather use the first form:

My intention in writing this is to not offend grammarians.

Language Log has a couple of similar examples.

share|improve this answer
add comment

The first example is actually incorrect. The use of a "not" to cut a verbal in half is wrong. Therefore, the second example should be used.

share|improve this answer
2  
The first is not at all incorrect; split forms like to not notice are completely correct grammar. See e.g. this Language Log post, or Geoffrey Pullum’s summary. 18th/19th century grammarians came up with the “rule” against split infinitives, and it’s hung around as a myth ever since, but it’s never been supported by actual usage, and almost no professional linguists today would accept it as a rule. –  PLL May 21 '11 at 13:41
1  
I believe it was Winston Churchill who said "This is the sort of pedantic nonsense up with which I will not put". Or something like that. –  FumbleFingers May 21 '11 at 17:43
add comment

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.