My high school teacher used to say, "No, the world is not round it is globular". Strictly speaking, is round more appropriately used to describe 2-dimensional objects (circle, oval, tire, plate or saucer) and globular, spherical or even cylindrical better for 3-dimensional objects (ball, egg, tube, pint glass or the earth). Or are we just dealing with a persnickety high school teacher?
|
|
Persnickety. Round is commonly used to describe spherical objects: http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/round
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/round
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/round
|
|||||
|
|
Merriam-Webster defines round as:
It sounds to me like a sphere would fit that definition nicely. It's possible that math or geometry specialists might define round as only applying to two-dimensional objects, but that usage would be properly considered jargon, rather than common English. |
|||
|
|
|
1 the earth is not round, A circle is round(1d), a ball is round or spheric(2d). The earth is flatten at the poles sow round or spheric do not fully describe that shape |
|||
|
|