Which plural do you use for a word that should have a regular plural but ends with a word that has its own irregular one? The example that made me ask was "leatherman" (the multitool) but there are plenty of others.
|
|
Short answer: it's up to the company, but nobody cares what the company says. The official plural of Walkman according to Sony is Walkman Personal Stereos, not *Walkmans or *Walkmen. People widely use walkmans nonetheless. Since Leatherman refers to a brand name and not a specific product, there probably is no official plural—even though Leatherman is used quite often colloquially to refer to a Leatherman-brand multitool. But people say Leathermans nonetheless. Seeing a pattern? One more amusing example: Bluetooth is used colloquially on its own to refer to a Bluetooth phone headset; a cursory Googling shows Bluetooths dominated by Bluetooth-related results, while Blueteeth gives mixed results, including a number of shoddily edited product sites, one of which claimed that the “pecifications” of a phone include “blueteeth”. So that's something. |
|||
|
In this case the tool is named after a Mr Leatherman - so it's a 'leatherman tool' (sing) or 'leatherman tools' (plural). |
|||||||
|