Someone criticized me for using the word "premises" to denote a set of assumed "propositions", due to its connotation with houses and buildings.
Is that correct? If so, what should be the proper plural form of "premise"?
|
Someone criticized me for using the word "premises" to denote a set of assumed "propositions", due to its connotation with houses and buildings. Is that correct? If so, what should be the proper plural form of "premise"? |
||||
|
|
|
Merriam-Webster give an example using premises: <the basic premises of the argument>. I do not think there is anything wrong with this use of premises. I don’t find homophony or having multiple meanings to be valid reasons to criticize use of a word. |
|||||||||
|
|
Premisses is sometimes used to distinguish the logical term, but premises is more common. There was allegedly a professor who continued to lecture during an air-raid even though plaster was falling from the walls, till the chairman said "I'm afraid I must stop you there, our premises will not sustain your conclusion." |
|||
|
|
I think that the confusion stems from multiple possible uses of "premises." The first is "premise" as a synonym for "proposition." Then it's one premise, two premises. But "premises" (with an s) can also refer to a location such as a house or building. Then the proper use of the world is "premises." |
|||
|
|