Wikitionary mentions offhand that "q.v." is used to reference material, but the definition it gives is far too sparse for my taste. My question is, what does "q.v." stand for and when should one use it? How does it compare with "cf.", for example?
|
q.v. stands for the phrase quod vide : "on this (matter) go see" Cf. is mainly used to reference articles proving or documenting one's point or having authority, not to avoid treating a particular aspect in the course of the writing. Compared to cf., most authors restrict its use to reference another part of the same work (usually a book) where they treat the subject matter. This is also used to advise the reader to read another work they endorse. In a monography or a large book, there is seldom one perfect way of organizing serially all the content. q.v. gives a mean to the author to help his reader learn more at his leasure:
On critical editions, you will sometimes find q.v. in margin comments or apostilles as a quick comment for a quote, giving its source. |
||||
|
This is what my NOAD says:
We can say that the meaning is something like "go to see...". Give a look at this book. |
||||
|
|
cf. stands for the Latin word confer (not the Italian confronta), and means "bring together", or more loosely translated, "hold what I just said next to this other thing". For example: "We shouldn't eat dogs, because they are cute (cf. rabbits)." |
|||
|
|
|
Use
|
|||
|
|